TOWN OF RHINEBECK, DUTCHESS COUNTY

PUBLIC WORKS RESOLUTION NO. 2026066 RE: DECLARING DUTCHESS COUNTY LEAD AGENCY AND ADOPTION OF DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IN CONNECTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY ROUTE 85 (SOUTH MILL ROAD) SLOPE FAILURE AND ROAD REPAIR PROJECT, TOWN OF RHINEBECK, DUTCHESS COUNTY Legislators VALDÉS SMITH, ATKINS, MUNN, BRENDLI, KEARNEY, LAWLER, RHODES and SHAH offer the following and move its adoption: WHEREAS, the County is the owner of County Route 85 South Mill Road (“CR 85”) and is responsible for the maintenance and improvement of same, and WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works (“DPW”) has advised that in July of 2024, CR 85 was closed to all traffic due to a significant settlement of the road embankment as a result of a deep slope failure under the road embankment which required analysis and repairs, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2024189, the County allocated $100,000 for consulting services to conduct a preliminary assessment and develop feasible solutions for this project, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2025066 the County authorized $378,750 for consultant services to perform detailed studies, engineering designs, purchase needed rights-of-way and prepare bid documents for the improvements as well as preparation of the environmental assessment forms for this project, and WHEREAS, in cooperation with its consultant, DPW completed a Short Environmental Assessment Form which documented the potential environmental impacts of the project, and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, it was determined that the proposed project (1) constitutes an Unlisted Action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (the “New York State Environmental Quality Review Act” or “SEQRA”) and its implementing regulations at 6 NYCRR Part 617, and (2) will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts, and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the Legislature in adopting this resolution, to adopt and confirm the above findings, and WHEREAS, 6 NYCRR Part 617 requires the designation of a lead agency from among the involved agencies before a determination of significance can be made, and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2026, DPW circulated the proposed action to all involved agencies of its intent to serve as lead agency in accordance with 6 NYCRR 617.6, and after the thirty-day response period there were no objections received, and PUBLIC WORKS WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this resolution to establish Dutchess County as lead agency, which will directly undertake and coordinate this project pursuant to SEQRA, and WHEREAS, a copy of the Short Environmental Assessment Form and the finding that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts are annexed hereto and made a part hereof, now therefore, be it RESOLVED, that Dutchess County hereby assumes lead agency status for this project and this Legislature hereby adopts and confirms the determination of the Dutchess County Department of Public Works' consultant that the proposed project entitled County Route 85 (South Mill Road) Slope Failure and Road Repair Project in the Town of Rhinebeck, Dutchess County, will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. CA-051-26 BP/rjw R-1078 04/07/26 Fiscal Impact: See Attached APPROVED Susanf Sereni SUSAN J. SERINO COUNTY EXECUTIVE Dao May 19, 2026 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF DUTCHESS ss: correct transcript of said original resolution and of the whole thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOR, I have hercunto sct my hand and seal of said legislaure this 2 day of Many 2026. JULIE TROISIT, CLERK OF THE LEGISLATURE COORDINATION Initialing indicates information only: _ County Attorney (as to form) Dw/Bf Public Works 3m ) Budget SUE SERINO COUNTY EXECUTIVE ROBERT H. BALKIND, P.E. COMMISSIONER DAVID C. WHALEN DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Dutchess COUNTY GovERNMENT DePARTMENT of PubLIC WOrKS MEMORANDUM TO: Gregg Pulver, Assistant County Executive FROM: Robert H. Balkind, P.E., Commissioner DATE: April 2, 2026 RE: RESOLUTION REQUEST - ADOPTION OF SEQR LEAD AGENCY AND DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR CR 85 (SOUTH MILL ROAD) SLOPE FAILURE AND ROAD REPAIR, TOWN OF RHINEBECK DPW's Engineering Division has been working with a consultant to perform planning, permitting and engineering design services, including development of bid documents for a project to repair a slope failure and collapsed roadway along a portion of County Route 85 (South Mill Road) in the Town of Rhinebeck. In November 2024, Resolution No. 2024189 was adopted to allocate $100,000 for consulting services to conduct a preliminary assessment and develop feasible solutions. In May 2025 the Legislature adopted Resolution No. 2025066 which authorized $378,750 for consultant services to perform detailed studies, engineering designs, purchase needed rights-of-way and prepared bid documents for the improvements. This work included preparation of the environmental assessment forms. The project was determined to be a SEQR Unlisted Action. SEQR Lead Agency notices were sent to interested and involved agencies on January 23, 2026, and after the thirty-day response period, no agency responded to challenge the County's intent to serve as Lead Agency. In cooperation with the County's consultant, the Department completed a Short Form Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) which documented potential environmental impacts. In conjunction with our consultant, the Department has concluded that the Unlisted Action will have No Significant Adverse Environmental Impact. The SEQR Lead Agency Notice and SEAF are attached to this memo. The Department is seeking the Legislature's adoption of the County's Lead Agency status, and to adopt the Determination of No Significant Adverse Environmental Impact for the proposed project. 626 Dutchess Turnpike, Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 | (845) 486-2085 | www.dutchessny.gov FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT • NO FISCAL IMPACT PROJECTED APPROPRIATION RESOLUTIONS (To be completed by requesting department) Total Current Year Cost $ Total Current Year Revenue $. and Source Source of County Funds (check one): • Existing Appropriations, •Contingency, •Transfer of Existing Appropriations, • Additional Appropriations, 2 Other (explain). Identify Line Items(s): Related Expenses: Amount $ Nature/Reason: Anticipated Savings to County: Net County Cost (this year): Over Five Years: Additional Comments/Explanation: Action. A Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) was completed, and the Department circulated for Lead Agency status. The SEAF and SEQR Circulation Notice is attached to this request. The Department is seeking the Legislature's adoption of the County's Lead Agency status, and to adopt the Determination of No Significant Adverse Environmental Impact for the proposed project. Prepared by: Robert H. Balkind, P.E. Prepared On: 4/02/26 Dut puf Chiarello, Regina From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Importance: Chiarello, Regina Friday, January 23, 2026 3:07 PM [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Balkind, Robert; Dutcavich, Mathew SEQR Lead Agency Notice_ RE_County Route 85 (Mill Road) Slope Stabilization - Town of Lead Agency Form CR 85.pdf; CR-85 SEAF Part 1_8.29.25. pdf; SEAF. 2+3.pdf; 2025-08-19 _CR85_ Schematic Plans for Utility Coordination.pdf High This e-mail is sent on behalf of Commissioner Robert H. Balkind, P.E. Greetings! Attached please find a SEQR Lead Agency Notice regarding the above listed project. Please complete the annexed Lead Agency Form and return it to the contact person listed therein (DPW Commissioner Robert H. Balkind, P.E.) prior to the expiration date of thirty-day notice. Thank you, Regina Regina Chiarello Confidential Administrative Assistant Dutchess County Department of Public Works 626 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Phone: (845) 486-2085 Fax: (845) 486-2940 Email: [email protected] www.dutchessny.gov County of Dutchess NOTICE TO INVOLVED AGENCIES THAT LEAD AGENCY MUST BE DESIGNATED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS County Route 85 (Mill Road) Slope Stabilization Town of Rhinebeck Date: 1/23/26 This Notice is issued pursuant to Part 617.6 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law to designate a lead agency. The Dutchess County Department of Public Works is intending to perform a project to stabilize a failed slope along County Route 85 (CR 85), in the Town of Rhinebeck. The work involves the installation of driven steel piles, a geosynthetic reinforced retaining walls, roadway reconstruction, and related paving, drainage, and guide rail. The action has been determined to be an Unlisted Action, pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR Part 617. LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION Under the applicable standards of 6 NYCRR Part 617.6(b), the County of Dutchess concludes that it should be designated as the lead agency in the coordinated environmental review of the action. This notification is being sent to involved and interested agencies with the request that you consent to the County of Dutchess serving as lead agency. If, however, you do not agree, you may follow the procedures outlined in 6 NYCRR 617.6(b)(5). This Notice is being transmitted on January 23, 2026. We ask that each involved agency complete the annexed form and return it to the contact person for receipt prior to the expiration of the required thirty-day notice period who may be contacted for further information. IF YOU DO NOT RESPOND WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS, IT WILL BE INTERPRETED AS CONSENT THAT THE COUNTY OF DUTCHESS SERVE AS LEAD AGENCY. YOU WILL CONTINUE TO BE NOTIFIED OF SEQR DETERMINATIONS AND ANY SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS AND HEARINGS, AS PROVIDED BY LAW. LEAD AGENCY NOTICE DATA SHEET Name of Action: County Route 85 Slope Stabilization Name of Applicant: Dutchess County SEQR Status: Type | Action based on the following thresholds: X _ Unlisted Action Description of Action: The Dutchess County Department of Public Works is intending to perform a project to stabilize a failed slope along County Route 85 (CR 85), in the Town of hinebeck. The work involves the installation of driven steel piles, a geosynthetic reinforce etaining walls, roadway reconstruction, and related paving, drainage, and guide rai Location of Action: County Route 85 (Mill Road), approximately 0.5 miles north of Cove Road, Town of Rhinebeck, Dutchess County Tax Map No.(s): 6168-00-038680, 6068-00-991742 Size of parcel(s): N/A Size of Action area: 0.93 Acres For further information, please contact: Robert H. Balkind, P.E., Commissioner Dutchess County Department of Public Works 626 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Phone: (845) 486-2925 Email address: [email protected] Thank you for your cooperation. DATED: January 23, 2026 ATTACHMENTS TO THIS NOTICE: [X] Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) [X] Preliminary Site Plan [X] Location Map A copy of this Notice is being sent to: INVOLVED AGENCIES: INTERESTED AGENCIES: Town of Rhinebeck 80 East Market Street Rhinebeck, NY 12572 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, NY 12561-1620 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District ATTN: Regulatory Branch, Room 16-400 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278-0090 NYS Parks -Taconic Region 9 Old Post Road PO Box 308 Staatsburg, NY 12580 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF DUTCHESS Proposed Lead Agency: County of Dutchess Name of Action: County Route 85 Slope Stabilization RESPONSE TO REQUEST THAT THE COUNTY OF DUTCHESS SERVE AS LEAD AGENCY REGARDING THE ABOVE ACTION On behalf of Agency Notice in this matter. →1, — acknowledge receipt of the Lead The above-named involved agency hereby: [PLEASE CHECK ONE] I 1 CONSENTS that the County of Dutchess serve as lead agency in this application and requests that the undersigned continue to be notified of SEQR determinations, proceedings and hearings in this matter. 11 DOES NOT CONSENT to the County of Dutchess serving as lead agency in this application and wishes that_ serve as lead agency. To contest lead agency designation, the undersigned intends to follow the procedures outlined in 6 NYCRR 617.6(b)(5). | 1 TAKES NO POSITION on Lead Agency designation. Any agency raising a dispute must be ready to assume the lead agency if such agency is designated by the commissioner per 6 NYCRR 617 (5) (1). DATED: _ New York Agency Name By: [signature] [print signer's name] Please return to: Robert H. Balkind, P.E., Commissioner Dutchess County Department of Public Works 626 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on (normation cumently available cument informsearch or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: CR-85 Slope Repair Project Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Dutchess County Route 85 (S Mill Road), between the bridge over Landsman Kill near Vanderburgh Cove and the driveway of 655 CR-85 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (845) 486-2925 Dutchess County Department of Public Works E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 626 Dutchess Tumpike City/PO: State: Poughkeepsie NY Zip Code: 12603 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NYSDOT, NY SHPO, USFWS, NYSDOS 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? ~0.93 acres ~n a3 acres ~0.93 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. • Urban • Rural (non-agriculture) • Industrial • Commercial [ Residential (suburban) V Forest • Agriculture Aquatic Other (Specify): •Parkland YES YES Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES /N/A NO YES NO YES NO YES a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO • YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing waste water utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? is located in the Hudson River Historic District and adjacent to several listed buildings. archaeolo he pies it, Slate isori Presed inor ofic Seo) are desiged ate initing 3. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contair vetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO • • NO • YES YES • Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •Shoreline • Forest • Agricultural/grasslands • Early mid-successional L Wetland • Urban V] Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? Northern Long-eared Bat, Shortnose Sturgeon, Atlantic Sturgeon, Bald Eagle, Indiana Bat 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: ste propater vil le directed to established conveyance systems and new field inlets, drainage conveyances, and drainage manholes 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: NO YES NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? NO The Hudson River PCB Sediments remediation site is located south of the project area. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Mathew Dutcavich Date: 1/16/2026 Signature: Mathew Dutcavich Title: Director of Engineering YES PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, August 27, 2025 9:42 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF quaction can bo obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooke. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources to confirm data provided by the Mapper or to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Sound Bichile Baric Kingston alantpel on Toronto Take Collis Hamliton Rochester Buffsio New York Albany Soures: Ect, Mar, Eats orass and aS Liper Commentas Massacau: Sources Er, HERE, Garmin USGS Intermad INCREMoga Rcan Est Japan MET, Esri Chira (Hong Kong) Esi Keies, Esi Thatand, NGCC, IC OpenStreetMap cartrautors and the GIS Pitchunh User Communit, En HERE Germin Men YUsss NPS Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites] Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal - Name] Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site] No Yes Yes Yes - Digital mapping information on local, New York State, and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to the EAF Workbook. Yes Northern Long-eared Bat, Shortnose Sturgeon, Atlantic Sturgeon, Bald Eagle, Indiana Bat Yes Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report Agency Use Only |If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by he project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided b he concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?' No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur • 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? i tea or eati repair te chance or quality of important histori, achaeological, • waterbodies red diate i wait, or and faint natural resources (eg, wetlands, 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? • • • PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance or every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why urticular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, pleas omplete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements tha ave been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agenc determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. The proposed project will occur almost entirely within the existing highway right-of-way and will have minimal impact n surrounding properties. The project involves driving steel piles, the construction of geosynthetic reinforced walls construction of an existing highway, and minor drainage improvements. All disturbed grounds will be restored wit topsoil and seed, and will be allowed to vegetate naturally. No buildings, walls, or structures other than the road will Impacting surrounding downhill properties. The nearby waterway is far enough removed from the project location nat runoff will not negatively impact water quality. There are no public or private utilities within the project limits. Al. mpacts from the construction will be temporary in nature. No permanent impacts to the environment will occur, anc the project will restore the use of the road to the public. Chech i box deta may reint, bad one prential and or spit bant are mues any documentation, environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Dutchess County 1/23/26 Nobert A Bakind, P.E. Print or Type Mangor ResPonse sion head Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Mathew Dutcavich Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 IONSAR UNTIED OCEANO KOEN DE SERVENE LAD HOE can an - 5 PACCO COURSE MALA (ICV NO AS 1195) IPICAL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT NENL HAMES DETH DILM ILMS PANSITE SO I ROADY CONTRAR Tectonic TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION www.teclonkcenploeetiog.com от 1200.02 T5-101 Tectonic MCCAL MUS www.lectortcanginsering.com GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 012502 D8-10 KATCHUNE SHEKT CP-101 Tectonic GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ACCID FELD MeI (AP) 20-tm Do I orely. Tectonic' inoarina.com GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 7120002 DR-103 Tectonic Dorely. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FE 20502 DR-100 O PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT LEGEND 4) но сикі PROPOSED STRIPING LEGEND cOLE 550 Tectonic GEOMETRY PLAN MATURE RET 0-102 PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT LEGEND OSE TUTA MYLACEMOT PROPOSED STRIPING LEGEND KATCHLKE SIEKY CI-102 HATCHUNE SHIXT CF-101 SATELNE BET OF19 Now Porty. Tectonic CROMETRY PLAN GP-102 PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT LEGEND BADE PROPOSED STRIPING LEGEND (0N5,087 ano) TA. HEROS Dowsetely. Tectonic™ GEOMETRY PLAN F1202 CP-103 = Tectonic GEOMSTRY PLAN • PACROSED UTUT POLL (P) SANTIS CONTHOL NOTE Dow Sorely. Tectonic! UTILITY PLAN HATEN BAT CF102 NOTE Delorely. Tectonic UTILITY PLAN 01205.02 U7-102 1T ст-100 Dow forty. Tectonic* UTILITY PLAN 212835.02 UT-103 Tectonic www.tectonkcengihpeilng.com Dig Safely. UTITY PLAN 70129502 7-100 O invol 15 02. artzi ** Tectonic PRACTICAL MALAI Dew Sorely. PROPILE Ps Oor FI 12035.02 PR-101 *. NNO 0O0 TO 25x00 Diw Ifoely Tectonic PRACTICAL sALUTA PROPILE •. o- 12035.02 PR-102 при ice Tectonic PROPILE 128502 78-103 Public Works and Capital Projects Roll Call District Name Yes No District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon Valdés Smith* X District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie Atkins* X District 20 - Red Hook, Tivoli, and Rhinebeck Munn* X District 3 - LaGrange Polasek* X District 12 - East Fishkill Metzger* ABSENT District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie Kaul X District 8 - City and Town of Poughkeepsie Brendli (C) X District 10 - City of Poughkeepsie Johnson ABSENT District 14 - Wappinger and Town of Poughkeepsie Winsby X District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill Rhodes (VC) X District 22 - Beekman and Union Vale Tresca X District 24 - Dover and Pawling House ABSENT 9 Present: ____ 3 Absent: ____ Vacant: ____ Resolution: ____ Motion: ____ 9 Total : ______ ______ Yes No Abstentions: _____ 2026066 DECLARING DUTCHESS COUNTY LEAD AGENCY AND ADOPTION OF DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IN CONNECTION WITH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY ROUTE 85 (SOUTH MILL ROAD) SLOPE FAILURE AND ROAD REPAIR PROJECT, TOWN OF RHINEBECK, DUTCHESS COUNTY Roll Call Sheets District Last Name YES NO District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon Valdés Smith District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie Atkins District 20 - Red Hook, Tivoli, and Rhinebeck Munn District 3 - LaGrange Polasek District 12 - East Fishkill Metzger District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie Redl District 2 - LaGrange, Pleasant Valley & Town of Poughkeepsie Arnoff District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie Lawler District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie Shah District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie Kaul District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley Darrow District 8 - City and Town of Poughkeepsie Brendli District 10 - City of Poughkeepsie Johnson District 11 - Clinton, Pleasant Valley, and Rhinebeck Kearney District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger Giles District 14 - Wappinger and Town of Poughkeepsie Winsby District 15 - Wappinger Faust District 17 - Town and Village of Fishkill McHoul District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill Rhodes District 19 - North East, Stanford, Pine Plains, Milan & Red Hook Drago District 21 - East Fishkill Caswell District 22 - Beekman and Union Vale Tresca District 23 - Pawling, Beekman and East Fishkill Rolison District 24 - Dover and Pawling House District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook Alexander X X X X X X X X X X X X ABSENT X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 Present: ____ 1 Absent: ____ Vacant: ____ Resolution: ____ Motion: ____ 24 Total : ______ ______ Yes No Abstentions: ____ CONSENT AGENDA: RESOLUTIONS 054, 064, 065, 066, 067, 068, 069, 070, 071, 072, 074, 075, 078, 079, 080, 081, 083, 084, 086, 087, 088 OF THE YEAR 2026