ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT

ENVIRONMENT POSTPONED TO AUGUST POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 9/5/2024 RESOLUTION NO. 2024125 RE: ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT Legislators D'AQUANNI, POLASEK, PAOLONI, GORMAN, FAUST, and ROLISON offer the following and move its adoption: WHEREAS, the Department of Emergency Response (the "Department") has proposed a project entitled the "Dutchess County Consolidated Two-Way Radio Communications System Project" (hereinafter referred to as the "Project"), which Project involves improvements to sixteen (16) exısting emergency communications land mobile radio tower sites throughout Dutchess, Orange and Ulster Counties, and includes installation of new towers and related equipment at three (3) additional sites in Dutchess County, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2024051, this Legislature declared the Department as lead agency for the coordinated review of the Project concerning ten (10) locations determined to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.6, requiring further environmental review and documentation; and WHEREAS, the Department has reviewed and prepared eight (8) Short Environmental Assessment Forms and has determined that: (1) each constitutes an Unlisted Action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Part 617.6 of the NYCRR ("SEQRA"), and (2) each will not have a significant effect on the environment, with the last location having been removed from the Project, and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the Legislature in adopting this resolution, to adopt and confirm the findings of the Department, and WHEREAS, true copies of each of the eight (8) Short Environmental Assessment Forms including Parts 1,2 and 3, reflecting the finding of non-significance are annexed hereto and made a part hereof, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this Legislature hereby adopts and confirms the Environmental Assessment Form determinations of the Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response concluding that the above referenced Project shall have no significant environmental impacts. APPROVED CA-070-24 LDF/jw G-0148-A Susar-serien 06/06/24 SUSAN J. SERINO Fiscal Impact: None. COUNTY EXECUTIVE STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Do 98-16-2024 COUNTY OF DUTCHESS This is to certify that I, the undersigned Clerk of the Legislature of the County of Dutchess, have compared the foregoing resolution with the original resolution now on file in the office of said clerk, and which was adopted by said Legislature on the 9 day of September 2024, and that the same is a true and correct transcript of said original resolution and of the whole thercof. IN WITNESS WHEREOR, I have hercunto set my hand and scal of said legislature this 9 day of Sc DU Righ Wager FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT E NO FISCAL IMPACT PROJECTED APPROPRIATION RESOLUTIONS (To be completed by requesting department) Total Current Year Cost $ ° Total Current Year Revenue $ ° and Source Source of County Funds (check one): Z Existing Appropriations, Contingency, • Transfer of Existing Appropriations, • Additional Appropriations, • Other (explain). Identify Line Items (s): Related Expenses: Nature/Reason: Amount $ Anticipated Savings to County: Net County Cost (this year): SO Over Five Years: Additional Comments/Explanation: Prepared On: June 5,2024 Prepared by: Laurie Colgan Dut pdf Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part I. Responses become part of the pplication for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based o nformation currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer a thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safety Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Pleasant Valley 22 Camp Nooteeming Road Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith, Commissioner Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: | State: Poughkeepsie INY T Zip Code: 12601 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO If Yes, list agencys) name and permit or approval: T/0 Pleasant Valley 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 229.51 acres 0.04 acres 229.51 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: • Urban Z Rural (non-agriculture) | • Industrial • Commercial • Residential (suburban) V Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other(Specify): • Parkland YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES N/A NO YES NO YES NO YES a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archacological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? . Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive fo rchaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory 3. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contai retlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: *A Freshwater Pond wetland is approximately 214' to the northeast of the existing access road. Additionally, a Freshwater Forested/shub wetland (PSE)is cated approximately 250 to the souls the compound. The proposed project wit have no impact on these wetlands. NO YES NO • YES Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •shoreline EZ Forest L Agricultural/grasslands • Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or ederal government as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO NO 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES • YES L YES MO 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam) f Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Smith Date: 08/18/2024 Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Camp Nooteeming Date: 08/18/2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by le project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided b he concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action? No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may occur may occur Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological architectural or aesthetic resources? wil the prop solacine result in any, ore chage lo natural resoures (e.B, wellands, 10. Willemproposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, Poding or drainage 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? V PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Camp Nooteeming Date: 08/18/2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Dutchess County Department of Emergency Respons 08/18/2024 Name of Lead Agenc Date Mr. Dana H. Smith arTes Name of Re anile for in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safety Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): East Mountain-611 SE Mountain Road, Wingdale, NY 12594 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Additional equipment being installed at public safety communication system compound consisting of an equipment shelter and foundation, generato cover and electionic gulpment wil be int. led inside the equipment shed the installation of antennas, microwave dishes wil be made to the existing Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith, Commissioner Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: State: Poughkeepsie, NY T. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, | Zip Code: 12601 NO administrative rule, or regulation? may be acted in the mediciali and the cent of am ae pone, cactin and then onmental resources that. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 53088 acres 0.01 acres 733.56 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: • Urban •Forest • Parkland Rural (non agriculture) Industrial • Commercial • Recidential (suburban) Agriculture Aquatic Other(Specify): YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO L YES N/A V NO YES NO YES NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES V NO 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? archaeologie pries site ra at fistori Presend in afice (SH) are designed sit ensive for 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES NO YES Page 2 ol 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •Shoreline IZ Forest Agricultural/grasslands • Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban • Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO V YES • O 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility?" If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: 08-18-2024 Signature: _Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Agency Use Only (If applicable! Project: East Mountian Date: 108-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by he project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided b he concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action? No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Leiteproposad arein respair he character or qualiy of important historic, archacological, Will the is al cite el in here ac to natural resources (c8, welands, 10. Willemproposed action result in an increase in the portenial for erosion, fooding or drainage 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: East Mountain Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation hat the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and at environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation hat the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response 08-18-2024 Name of Lead Agency Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agony Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safety Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 232 NY-292 Holmes, NY 12531-Harmony Hill Brief Description of Proposed Action: enerator and found ton, propane et an and padu blen coy pound i completed, the instalation of aisten afa goiaven she rand foundation, enerator and foundatio existing tower and electronic equipment will be installed inside the equipment shelter. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith Commissioner, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: State: Poughkeepsie, INY Zip Code: 12601 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO administrative rule, or regulation? It Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a pennit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NO 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 3.96 acres 0.003 acres 3.96 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: •Urban E Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial • Commercial • Residential (suburban) • Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (Specity): • Parkland YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. 6. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES N/A NO YES NO YES NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed 9. action? Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES V NO 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? NO YES T. a. and a private is eled by seri, sar a local geng the proposed action, contain b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •Shoreline IZ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban • Suburban 5. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State ederal government as threatened or endangerec 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES NO YES NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Smith Signature: 524.5H2 Date: 08-18-2024 Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Question 15 - Additional comments Dynamic Environmental Associates evaluation of flora and fauna in the Site area used the current list of Threatened and Endangered Species that have been identified in the immediate project area. No listed or proposed threatened or endangered species were observed on or in proximity to the Site. Further, it is our opinion that the proposed project will have and historically has had no effect on listed threatened or endangered species. An assessment was conducted by Dynamic Environmental Associates to determine if any of the listed or proposed T&E species were readily observable and/or whether the habitat necessary to support the listed species is present or was likely to have historically been present on or in proximity to the Site. No listed or proposed threatened or endangered species were observed on or in proximity to the Site. Further, it is their opinion that the proposed project will have and historically has had no effect on habitat that may be used by T&E species. Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Harmony Hill Date: 108-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action? No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? arier or a atic sure chancer quily inan histori, reacological, . at here go one air ai, an an anal sorcer 68, elands,. 10. Will engroposed acion result in an increase in the polential for erosion, noodling or drainage 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? L M VI • PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Harmony Hill Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response 08-18-2024 Name of Lead Agency Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based o nformation currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer a thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safely Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safety Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 401 Woodmont Road, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith Commissioner, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: T State: Poughkeepsie INY Zip Code: 12601 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NO 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1634 acres 0.009 acres 117.07 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: Uhan l Rural (non-agriculture.) • Industrial • Commercial D Residential (suburban) V Forest Agriculture • Aquatic Other (Specify): • Parkland YES YES Page 1 ol 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES N/A V NO YES NO YES NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: V NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? archad to the pies site, or an paris ofit Pested no odie to 0) area designited sit insive o 3. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, conta etlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES NO YES Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •shoreline EZ Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional •Wetland L Urban L Suburban 5. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State o 'ederal government as threatened or endangered 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES NO YES NO 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: YES V NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Smith Signature A K. St Date: 08-18-2024 Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 ol 3 Question 15 - Additional comments An assessment was conducted by Dynamic Environmental Associates to determine if any of the listed or proposed T&E species were readily observable and/or whether the habitat necessary to support the listed species is present or was likely to have historically been present on or in proximity to the Site. No listed or proposed threatened or endangered species were observed on or in proximity to the Site. Further, it is their opinion that the proposed project will have and historically has had no effect on habitat that may be used by T&E species. Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Hosner Mountain Date: 03-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. /ill the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlan aterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna) i prilli proposed action result in an increase in tie porerial for erosion, fading or drainage 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? PRINT FORM Page 1 of2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only |If applicable] Project: Hosner Mountain Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. • Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response 08-18-2024 Name of Lead Agency Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Print or Type Name or Responsible Offer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safety Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 298 Perotti Road Millerton, NY 12546-Silver Mt. Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith, Commissioner Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: | State: Poughkeepsie NY Zip Code: 12601 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? NO If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources thal may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 14.93 acres 0.02 acres 14.93 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: • Urban 2 Kural (non-agriculture) • Industrial L Commercial • Residential (suburban) Forest • . Agriculture Aquatic • Other (Specify): • Parkland YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES N/A NO YES NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO V YES NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? arcial, is the siest it, a spot isori rested in ofice to are desigid si ensive o we lands or ter water it is erased by sed ari, state or local agang the proposed action, contain b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES NO YES Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •Shoreline i Forest L Agricultural/grasslands L Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban •] Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO V NO V NO YES YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: YES L 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water roster li per end pend, watchan, dam NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE pplicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Sm Signature: 21Sk Date: 08-18-2024 Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Agency Use Only (If applicable) Project: Siver Mountain Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No, or small impact may occur Moderate to larg impaci may occur Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Wil the prop or ad actin resour che character or quality of important histori, archacological, will be irs gased alivate result i ty, doerse chaun to natural resources (6.8, wetlands, 10. Willempose acion result in an increase in the prential or rosion, losing or dainage 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? • • PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Silver Mountain Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Chack his bos if you han day ried, base on the portain and or ligi ban and any supering cumentation. environmental impact statement is required heck this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentatio at the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impac Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response 08-18-2024 Name of Lead Agency Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safely Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 25 Highland Street, Millerton, NY 12546 Brief Description of Proposed Action: dditional equipment being installed at public safety communication system compound consisting of an equipment shelter and foundation, generat nd foundation, propane fuel tank and pad. When compound is completed, the installation of antennas, microwave dishes will be made to the existi water tower and electronic equipment will be installed inside the equipment shelter. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith Commissioner, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: Poughkeepsie Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] State: INY 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, Zip Code: 12601 NO If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: Approval of antenna mount by Millerton Water District 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.61 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.008 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 1.61 acres NO 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: Urban LJ Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial • Commercial IZ Residential (suburban) • Forest • Agriculture = Aquatic Other (Specify): • Parkland YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. 6. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES N/A NO NO YES V YES NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO V NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archacological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? • Is the project site. o archae logises ith y State Historic Preed ion office (SPO) are desiggicad site inveriveryo 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: YES • NO YES Page 2 ol 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •Shoreline • Forest • Agricultural/grasslands • Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban EZ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES NO YES L YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO V 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:_ NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Smith Signature RA.SH Date: 08-18-2024 Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Question 15 - Additional comments Dynamic Environmental Associates evaluation of flora and fauna in the Site area used the current list of Threatened and Endangered Species that have been identified in the immediate project area. No listed or proposed threatened or endangered species were observed on or in proximity to the Site. Further, it is our opinion that the proposed project will have and historically has had no effect on listed threatened or endangered species. An assessment was conducted by Dynamic Environmental Associates to determine if any of the listed or proposed T&E species were readily observable and/or whether the habitat necessary to support the listed species is present or was likely to have historically been present on or in proximity to the Site. No listed or proposed threatened or endangered species were observed on or in proximity to the Site. Further, it is their opinion that the proposed project will have and historically has had no effect on habitat that may be used by T&E species. Agency Use Only (If applicable] Project: Millerton Water Tower Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. ari therapore sicion resour the character or quality of important historic, archacological, Will their, gred actine, air in ay, toes ech aue to natural resources (-3, Wetlands, 10. Wilte proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? • L • V PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only (If applicable! Project: Millerton Water Tower Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. • Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response 08-18-2024 Name of Lead Agency Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Print or The Nim n esponsi icer it: Iad Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part I - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safely Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map: 199 Ohland Road Stanfordville, NY 12581 Brief Description of Proposed Action: dditional equipment being installed at a public safety communication system compound consisting of an equipment shelter and foundation, generato nd foundation, propane fuel tank and pad. When compound is completed, the installation of antennas, microwave dishes will be made to the existin tower and electronic equipment will be installed inside the equipment shelter. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith, Commissioner Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: State: Poughkeepsie INY T Zip Code: 12601 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.08 acres 0.005 acres 0.08 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: •Urban EZ Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial M Forest Agriculture Aquatic • Parkland Commercial • Residential (suburban) Other(Specify): YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES N/A • • NO YES NO YES NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: ***A NWI wetland is within 150 feet of the site. The proposed project will have no impact on these wetlands." NO YES Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •shoreline IZ Forest Agricultural/grasslands • Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban • Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal goverment as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES NO NO YES L YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Smith Signature T24.5M Date: 08-18-2024 Title: Commissioner PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Stanford Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by le project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided b le concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action? No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur L 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlan terbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? V PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Stanford Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Lead Agency 08-18-2024 Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1- Project and Sponsor Information Public Safety Radio System Upgrade, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Name of Action or Project: Public Safety Radio System Upgrade Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 4362 NY-22 Amenia, NY 12501-Wassaic Station Brief Description of Proposed Action: setiran and pound ben, propaned at an and paul an or pound i aimp ye the malad on in of angrier stereo a . existing tower and electronic equipment will be installed inside the equipment shelter Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Dana Smith Commissioner, Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response Telephone: 845-486-2080 E-Mail: [email protected] Address: 392 Creek Road City/PO: State: Poughkeepsie INY Zip Code: 12601 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO administrative rule, or regulation? if Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources tha nay be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: MTA-NY 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.08 acres 0.005 acres 0.08 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: • Urban • Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial • Commercial • Residential (suburban) • Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (Specify): L Parkland YES YES Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. 6. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES NO NO NO 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _. NO V NO 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district Chich is lie on the Nicole i a s ere in and lists are at been delice ry thing on the State Register of Historic Places? archae, to the sies site, ora pate is ori redion odie So 3) are desigid at sensivo 1. a Parts aror aerobes eftled by seri, at on load sing te proposed action, contain b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: here is a freshwater pond located approximately 293 feet north of the Site, a Riverine wetland located approximately 172 fee outheast of the Site, and Ereshwater Emergent wetlands located approximately 135 feet south and 116 feet southeast of the Site. The proposed project will have no impact on these. NO NO Page 2 of 3 N/A YES YES YES YES YES | YES YES YES 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: •Shoreline E Forest Agricultural/grasslands • Early mid-successional •Wetland • Urban L Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO V NO YES YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water 1 Yes, explain the pure and site of te imagina NO YES 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing o NO ompleted) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: he has brian prodil closer Site pral i a ma 22 the Super tund st approximately 2,700 feet north of the sile. T he project will have no impact on the Superfund sit I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/name: Dana H. Smith Date: 08-18-2024 Signe 2RStL Title: Commissioner YES PRINT FORM Page 3 ol 3 Agency Use Only (If applicable! Project: Wassaic Station Date: 108-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No, or small impact may occur - Moderate to large impact may occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walk way? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands vaterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna) 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? • • • PRINT FORM Page 1 of 2 SEAF 2019 Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project: Wassaic Station Date: 08-18-2024 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts Dutchess County Department of Emergency Response 08-18-2024 Name of Lead Agency Date Mr. Dana H. Smith Print or Type. Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Commissioner Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 SUE SERINO COUNTY EXECUTIVE U DANA H. SMITH COMMISSIONER SHAWN A. CASTANO DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DUTCHESS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE To: Sue Serino, Dutchess County Executive From: Dana Smith, Commissioner of Emergency Response Re: College Hill radio tower site Date: August 31, 2024 On August 28, 2024, we received an updated Phase | Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) from our consultant Dynamic Environmental Associates (DEA) regarding College Hill radio tower site. They are reporting a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) has been identified as a result of recent information provided by City of Poughkeepsie Engineer Richard L. DuPilka, P.E. He reported to DEA there is an unregistered and abandoned underground storage tank (UST) approximately 25' from our proposed site. It also appears through preliminary investigation this tank is no longer intact. It is also unknown if the fluids originally in the UST were properly disposed of or leached into the ground. This information was not identifiable on the SEQR review nor the original Phased I ESA report as the UST was never reported or registered with the appropriate authorities. DEA is recommending further study and a PHASE I! ESA to include soil sampling at the site. As this site is of critical importance to the radio coverage in the City of Poughkeepsie, we would like to continue to investigate this issue and develop a remediation plan. However, the effort will add further delays to our project as well as add additional costs. This tank will eventually have to be removed as it is in the area that is to be reclaimed for parkland. There may be contamination which must be mitigated prior to any site development. I am asking to pull the Short Environmental Assessment Forms for the College Hill site from the resolution request we submitted for consideration at the next meeting of the Dutchess County Legislature to allow the remainder of the project to continue without further delay. I am recommending we continue the development and approval of the College Hill radio tower site, but not until the REC is evaluated and mitigated. This site is of critical importance to the coverage and functionality for the emergency services in the City of Poughkeepsie and we should continue to pursue it. The REC at the site should, however, not delay the rest of the project development. 392 Creek Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 | (845) 486-2080 | Fax: (845) 486-3998 dutchessny.gov SUE SERINO COUNTY EXECUTIVE DANA H. SMITH COMMISSIONER SHAWN A. CASTANO DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DUTCHEsS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE Mayor Yvonne Flowers 62 Civic Center Plaza Po Fleepsie, NY 12601 August 8, 2024 Mayor Flowers, As you know, Dutchess County is developing a consolidated two-way radio system for utilization by all emergency services in Dutchess County, including the City of Poughkeepsie Fire and Police Departments. The system has been designed to improve radio coverage in the City of Poughkeepsie. As discussed, developing a replacement radio tower at College Hill Park is a key to the improved coverage. It is my understanding the Poughkeepsie City Council will consider a resolution requesting Parkland Alienation from New York State August 20t, 2024. I am hopeful the Council supports the resolution. This site is a key component to offer necessary signal coverage to the City of Poughkeepsie as part of the larger countywide network. We have looked at several design alternatives with our vendor, Motorola, and our consultant, NYSTEC and none provide the necessary coverage as well as this site. If the Council does not adopt the Parkland Alienation request at their next meeting it will force the county to move the larger project forward without the College Hill Park site. This will impact coverage and effectiveness specifically for the City of Poughkeepsie. I must consider all the other agencies and the effectiveness of our entire system. Further delays will have significant impacts on the timeline, cost of the project, and negatively impacts all the other emergency services agencies in Dutchess County. I do want to thank you and your staff for their efforts and assistance in developing this very important project. Sincerely, Dana H. Smith Cc: Joesph Donat, City Administrator 392 Creek Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 | (845) 486-2080 | Fax: (845) 486-3998 dutchessny.gov SCENIC HUDSON • ORG SCENIC HUDSON, INC. 85 Civic Center Plaza Suite 300 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Tel: 845 473 4440 Fax: 845 473 2648 ScenicHudson.org August 8, 2024 By email: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT Dear Chair Truitt and Members of the Dutchess County Legislature: Scenic Hudson is writing to alert you to significant errors in the Short Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") for the proposed telecommunications facility to be located within the Historic District at College Hill Park. Dutchess County should not advance this project without conducting SEQRA's requisite hard look at the potential for environmental, visual, and community character impacts, including impacts to dedicated parkland at College Hill and the Dudley Memorial Shelter, which is itself designated as an important historic site. We are unable to attend tonight's Environment Committee meeting but respectfully request that this letter be read into the public record. The Short EAF submitted for review at the August 8th Environment Committee's meeting erroneously states that the site does not contain, nor is it substantially contiguous to any resources listed or eligible for listing on the National or State Register of Historic Places.? The site of the proposed telecommunications tower is immediately adjacent to the Dudley Memorial Shelter, and, in fact the tower is proposed within the boundaries of its listing on both State and National Registers of Historic Places (see attached).3 Further, the location of the proposed telecommunications facility relative to the historic Dudley Memorial Shelter and surrounding College Hill Park requires that Dutchess County review this proposal as a Type 1 action under SEQRA, 4 rather than as an Unlisted action as currently indicated. Type | actions require a Full EAF—not a Short Form." In this case, because of the nature of the proposed action —a 120' lattice tower adjacent to historic resources in dedicated parkland-an assessment of visual impacts is especially necessary? 1 N.Y.S. Parks and Recreation, Building-Structure Inventory Form, Unique Site No. 02740.000075 (Aug. 6, 1980) attached). 2 See Dutchess Cty., N.Y. Resolution No. 2024125, p. 4 (attached). 3 See N.Y.S. Parks, Recreation, and Hist. Preserv., Cultural Resource Info. System, National Register: 90PR04300 (available at https://cris.parks.ny.gov/). 4 6 NYCRR 617.4(b)(9), 617.4(b)(10). 5 Resolution No. 2024125, p. 1. 6 6 NYCRR 617.6(a)(2). ' See generally N.Y.S. Dep't of Envtl. Conserv., Assessing and Mitigating Visual Impacts, DEP-00-2, p. 8 (revised Dec. 13, 2019). 1 SCENIC HUDSON • ORG SCENIC HUDSON, INC. 85 Civic Center Plaza Suite 300 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Tel: 845 473 4440 Fax: 845 473 2648 ScenicHudson.org Scenic Hudson strongly urges the Dutchess County Legislature to review this proposal as a Type I action under SEQRA, and to carefully reconsider its other responses in the Short EAF. For example, item 6 of Part 1 states that the proposed lattice tower is "consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape."S This claim requires further explanation. The project site is within an important City park, and while the proposed tower would replace a telephone pole of approximately the same height, the lattice tower would be much wider and visually intrusive when seen from the most important part of the park: its historically significant summit. Finally, because of the importance of College Hill Park and its historic resources, Scenic Hudson recommends an alternatives assessment of other possible construction locations, including a full visual assessment with computer generated simulations.? This process should include important stakeholders, including the City's Historic District and Landmark Preservation Commission, Revive College Hill Park Coalition, Celebrating the African Spirit, The Poughkeepsie Alliance and others interested in this matter. Scenic Hudson would also like to be apprised as to future steps in this process. Scenic Hudson supports Dutchess County's efforts to upgrade its emergency communications system and understands the benefits it will provide to the City of Poughkeepsie, its emergency responders, and its residents. Our recommendation is intended to facilitate the rollout of these improvements so that they will not be delayed by the New York State Historic Preservation Office or others with standing in this matter because of improper review. Sincerely, Safery Aryainm Jeffrey Anzevino, AICP Director of Land Use Advocacy Attachments Cc Nancy Herter, NYS Historic Preservation Office Sloane Bullough, NYS Historic Preservation office 8 Resolution No. 2024125, p. 4. 9 See, e.g., Matter of Cade v. Stapf, 91 A.D.3d 1229, 1232 (3d Dep't 2012) ("hard look" required examination of proposed water tower's visual impact). 2 UNIQUE SITE NO. 02740. 0000z5t DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEW YORK STATE PARKSAND RECREATION ALBANY. NEW YORK (518) 474-0470 QUAD _ SERIES - NEG. NO. PIONROStel YOUR NAME:_ Townley McElhiney Sharp - DATE: August 6, 1980 YOUR ADDRESS: Box 273, Hurley, N.Y. TELEPHONE: _ 914-331-8944 ORGANIZATION (if any): Historic Architecture and Decorative Arts Consultants ********************** ********* * * * IDENTIFICATION T. BUILDING N'AME(S): Guilford Dudley Memorial RA - 2. COUNTY: - Dutchess TOWNICHY Poughkeepsie VILLAGE ?. STREET LOCATION: College Hill Park UTM: 18/590230/4618150 4. OWNERSHIP: a. public * b. private S. PRESENT OWNER: Supt. of Public Works 1. USE: Onginal: memorial 7. ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC ADDRESS: Howard St. Present: memorial Exterior visible from public road: Yes Interior accessible: Explain Yes No DESCRIPTION X. BUILDING MATERIAL: a. clapboard OJ e. cobblestone b. stone X f. shingles C c. brick C g. stucco d. board and batten other: " STROCTURAL SYSTEM: (i knovn) I0. CONDITION: 11. INTEGRITY. a. wood frame with interlocking joints C b. wood frame with light members i. masonry load bearing walls a d. metal (explain) — e other a. excellent C b. good 58 c. fair a. original site x b. moved O if so when? c. list major alterations and dates (if known): None d. deteriorated C 12. PHOTO: 13. MAP: correct HP. 1 14. THREATS TO BUILDING: a. none known d. developers b. zoning L e. deterioration c. roads C f. other: 15. RELATED OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY: i. barn O • carnage house.- c. garage d. privy O shed L F. greenhouse O g. shop h. gardens O i. landscape features: College Hill Park j. other: 16. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING a. open land (x (check more than one if necessary) : b. woodland x c. scattered buildings d. densely built-up e. commercial O f. industrial C g. residential O h. other: College Hill Park 17. INTI RELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: (Indicate if building or structure is in an historic district) Facade faces south overlooking College Hill Park; a few small park structures are in the immediate area; to the far north, west, and south are residences; to the far east some industrial buildings and residences. 18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (including interior features if known): This structure is a Greek temple form; triangular pediment; Doric entablature and columns; open interior with piazza; terrace and balustrade surround; wide, sweeping stairs in front, back, and at sides. SIGNIFICANCE 19. DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION:_ 1936 ARCHITECT: John P. Draney of Poughkeepsie BUILDER: 20 HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: The first structure on this site was built as a replica of the Parthenon and opened in 1836 as the Collegiate School, specializing in classical and com- mexcial education. After the school's relocation in 1867, the building was owned by Mayor George Morgan and also operated as a hotel for a short time. He built the reservoir, "Morgan Lake" on the east side of the hill. John Guy Vassar, Matthew Vassar's nephew, was the next owner and his purpose in obtaining the property was to establish an orphanage, but this plan was over- thrown by the local courts. Finally, in 1892, William w. Smith, of the Smith Brothers Cough Drops firm, purchased the property for $11,600 and gave it to the city, indicating that it should be a public park. (concinusd) 21. SOURCES: Opdycke, Guide; Adriance Memorial Library; Files: Letter from Dennis S. Francis, August 2, 1979; Platt, History of Poughkeepsie; Dutchess County Historical Society, Yearbook, 1937; Maps: c.1850, 1857, 1867, 1874, 1876, 22. IMEME c.1880, 1891. Mid-20th-century civic architecture. HISTORIC RESOURCES THE CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK wilford Dudley Memorial (#13) BUILDING # 13 , continued Guilford Dudley Memorial 18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE, CONTINUED 20. HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE, CONTINUED Apparently, the landscape architect was Downing Vaux, who also planned the elaborate Kingston Point Park, and whose father Calvert Vaux designed Central Park in N.Y.C. In fact, the father may have begun plans for College Hill before his death, but it was the son who exhibited the "General Plan for the Improvement of College Hill Park, Poughkeepsie" before the Architectural League of N.Y. in 1900 and the American Society of Landscape Architects in 1903. The original school building burned in 1917 and was replaced by the smaller replica, the Guilford Dudley Memorial Shelter in 1936. Its architect was John P. Draney of Poughkeepsie. The hill is the highest point in the city and always been a prominent physical feature of the city, easily identified in early prints and drawings. Today, the park is used for skiing and golf, for Fourth of July fireworks and picnics. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION: The boundary of the nominated parcel is defined by the 350' contour line as the attached City of Poughkeepsie planometric map. • HISTORIC RESOURCES THE CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE Guilford Dudley Memorial (#13) BUILDING # 13 DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK , continued College Hill Park 30000 MEONIXONE 4000 6000 STREET =° c COUL 00000 00000 C 20=30 g0000000 09009 00000000 00 STREET 0000 • 0000303 OF OF 0000 Historic kesources or the Lity or rougnkeepsle Dutchess County, New York Guilford Dudley Memorial College Hill Park Tax Map #6162.56.450437 5.3 acres City of Poughkeepsie Map 1977 Scale 1"= 400' USGS - Poughkeepsie Quadrangle, New York Scale 1:24,000 UTM #18/590230/4618150 POUGHKEEPSIEL POUGHKEEPSIE HAVEN RAIL. HARTHORO , NEW MORGAN 315-7102 D0000 COLLEGE 8700, 00 00000000 200. 000 180 BM 23 WaterE Works- 62 55 chland ding ind B Oil & Ga 1.7 Oil and Gasoline IDSON BRIDGE TOLL rellow flue Oi and Gasoline ฿M Mine Pr ENTRI astma RURAL CEMETERY PETERS ENDERHI St Francis Hospital BIV BM 220% Morgen Luke PARK (1= YORKE 213 Morse La Seh14 I RANCHUR 55. -200. E 203 YERRIS 178 CORLES COLLEGE ; Field Nassar Temple SOUTH Sch 250 INNIS NORES Aglington KENE d5r • High Sch ДУМО. pola Calvary Cemetery Vussar Luke ECE. Sunset Yank '0o Historic Resources of the City of Poughkeepsie Dutchess County, New York Guilford Dudley Memorial College Hill Park Tax Map #6162.56.450437 5.3 acres City of Poughkeepsie Map 1977 Scale 1"= 400' USGS - Poughkeepsie Quadrangle, New York Scale I:24,000 UTM #18/590230/4618150 ige Arlin Spee SCENIC HUDSON • ORG SCENIC HUDSON, INC. 85 Civic Center Plaza Suite 300 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Tel: 845 473 4440 Fax: 845 473 2648 ScenicHudson.org August 8, 2024 By email: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT Dear Chair Truitt and Members of the Dutchess County Legislature: Scenic Hudson is writing to alert you to significant errors in the Short Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") for the proposed telecommunications facility to be located within the Historic District at College Hill Park. Dutchess County should not advance this project without conducting SEQRA's requisite hard look at the potential for environmental, visual, and community character impacts, including impacts to dedicated parkland at College Hill and the Dudley Memorial Shelter, which is itself designated as an important historic site.1 We are unable to attend tonight's Environment Committee meeting but respectfully request that this letter be read into the public record. The Short EAF submitted for review at the August 8th Environment Committee's meeting erroneously states that the site does not contain, nor is it substantially contiguous to any resources listed or eligible for listing on the National or State Register of Historic Places.? The site of the proposed telecommunications tower is immediately adjacent to the Dudley Memorial Shelter, and, in fact the tower is proposed within the boundaries of its listing on both State and National Registers of Historic Places (see attached).3 Further, the location of the proposed telecommunications facility relative to the historic Dudley Memorial Shelter and surrounding College Hill Park requires that Dutchess County review this proposal as a Type I action under SEQRA, 4 rather than as an Unlisted action as currently indicated. Type I actions require a Full EAF —not a Short Form.® In this case, because of the nature of the proposed action -a 120' lattice tower adjacent to historic resources in dedicated parkland-an assessment of visual impacts is especially necessary? 1 N.Y.S. Parks and Recreation, Building-Structure Inventory Form, Unique Site No. 02740.000075 (Aug. 6, 1980) (attached). 2 See Dutchess Cty., N.Y. Resolution No. 2024125, p. 4 (attached). 3 See N.Y.S. Parks, Recreation, and Hist. Preserv., Cultural Resource Info. System, National Register: 90PR04300 (available at https://cris.parks.ny.gov/). 4 6 NYCRR 617.4(b)(9), 617.4(b)(10). 5 Resolution No. 2024125, p. 1. 6 6 NYCRR 617.6(a)(2). 'See generally N.Y.S. Dep't of Envtl. Conserv., Assessing and Mitigating Visual Impacts, DEP-00-2, p. 8 (revised Dec. 1 SCENIC HUDSON • ORG SCENIC HUDSON, INC. 85 Civic Center Plaza Suite 300 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Tel: 845 473 4440 Fax: 845 473 2648 ScenicHudson.org Scenic Hudson strongly urges the Dutchess County Legislature to review this proposal as a Type l action under SEQRA, and to carefully reconsider its other responses in the Short EAF. For example, item 6 of Part 1 states that the proposed lattice tower is "consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape."S This claim requires further explanation. The project site is within an important City park, and while the proposed tower would replace a telephone pole of approximately the same height, the lattice tower would be much wider and visually intrusive when seen from the most important part of the park: its historically significant summit. Finally, because of the importance of College Hill Park and its historic resources, Scenic Hudson recommends an alternatives assessment of other possible construction locations, including a full visual assessment with computer generated simulations. This process should include important stakeholders, including the City's Historic District and Landmark Preservation Commission, Revive College Hill Park Coalition, Celebrating the African Spirit, The Poughkeepsie Alliance and others interested in this matter. Scenic Hudson would also like to be apprised as to future steps in this process. Scenic Hudson supports Dutchess County's efforts to upgrade its emergency communications system and understands the benefits it will provide to the City of Poughkeepsie, its emergency responders, and its residents. Our recommendation is intended to facilitate the rollout of these improvements so that they will not be delayed by the New York State Historic Preservation Office or others with standing in this matter because of improper review. Sincerely, Jeffery Argenier Jeffrey Anzevino, AICP Director of Land Use Advocacy Attachments Cc Nancy Herter, NYS Historic Preservation Office Sloane Bullough, NYS Historic Preservation office 8 Resolution No. 2024125, p. 4. 9 See, e.g., Matter of Cade v. Stapf, 91 A.D.3d 1229, 1232 (3d Dep't 2012) ("hard look" required examination of proposed water tower's visual impact). 2 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SUILDING-STRUCTURE INVENTORY FORM 13. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION ALBANY. NEW YORK (518) 474-0479 UNIQUE SITE NO. 02740. 000075 QUAD. PONROSSOl SERIES NEG. NO. YOUR NAME:_ Townley McElhiney Sharp DATE: _ August 6, 1980 YOUR ADDRESS:_ Box 273, Hurley, N.Y. TELEPHONE: 914-331-8944 ORGANIZATION (if any): Historic Architecture and Decorative Arts Consultants ****** ************** * * * * IDENTIFICATION T. BUILDING N'AME(S): Guilford Dudley Memorial Pi R 2. COUNTY: Dutchess TOWNIC Poughkeepsie ?. STREET LOCATION: College Hill Park UTM: 18/590230/4618150 4. OWNERSHIP: a. public * b. private S. PRESENT OWNER: Supt. of Public Works ADDRESS: Howard St. .. USE: Onginal: memorial Present:.. memorial 7. ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC Exterior visible from public road: Yes No O Interior accessible: Explain * * DESCRIPTION 8. BUILDING MATERIAL: a. clapboard O stone a c. cobblestone Of. shingles c. brick O g. stucco O d. board and batten O other: • STRUCTURAI SYSTEM: (f kravn) I0. CONDITION: I. INTEGRITY wood frame with interlocking joints O b. wood frame with light members O c. masonry load bearing walls Ix! d. metal (explain) — e. other :. excellent C h. good x c. fair O a. original site i* b. moved O if so, when? c. list major alterations and dates (if known): None d. deteriorated O 12. PHOTO: 13. MAP: HP. 1 : 14. THREATS TO BUILDING: a. none known x d. developers b. zoning O c. roads C e. deterioration O f. other: 15. RELATED OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY: d. barn C b. carriage house L c. garage D d. privy C c. shed O f. greenhouse O g. shop O h. gardens O i. landscape features: College Hill Park j. other: 16. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING (check more than one if necessary): a. open land x Woodland x c. scattered buildings O d. densely built-up O e. commercial L f. industrial O 8. residential O] h. other: College Hill Park 17. INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: (Indicate if building or structure is in an historic district) Facade faces south overlooking College Hill Park; a few small park structures are in the immediate area; the far north, west, and south are residences; to the far east some industrial buildings and residences. 18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (including interior features if known): This structure is a Greek temple form; triangular pediment; Doric entablature and columns; open interior with piazza; terrace and balustrade surround; wide, sweeping stairs in front, back, and at sides. SIGNIFICANCE 19. DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION: _ 1936 ARCHITECT: John P. Draney of Poughkeepsie BUT DER: 20 HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: The first structure on this site was built as a replica of the Parthenon and opened in 1836 as the Collegiate School, specializing in classical and com- mercial education. After the school's relocation in 1867, the building was owned by Mayor George Morgan and also operated as a hotel for a short time. He built the reservoir, "Morgan Lake" on the east side of the hill. John Guy Vassar, Matthew Vassar's nephew, was the next owner and his purpose in obtaining the property was to establish an orphanage, but this plan was over- thrown by the local courts. Finally, in 1892, William W. Smith, of the Smith Brothers Cough Drops firm, purchased the property for $11,600 and gave it to the city, indicating that it should be a public park. (onnetnusd) 21. SOURCES: raycks, Auste: 2, 1209 Opdycke, Guide; Adriance Memorial Library; Files: Letter from Dennis S. Francis, August 2, 1979; Platt, History of Poughkeepsie; Dutchess County Historical Society, Yearbook, 1937; Maps: c.1850, 1857, 1867, 1874, 1876, 22. THEME c. 1880, 1891. Mid-20th-century civic architecture. HISTORIC RESOURCES THE CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK Guilford Dudley Memorial (#13) BUILDING # , continued Guilford Dudley Memorial 18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE, CONTINUED 20. HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE, CONTINUED Apparently, the landscape architect was Downing Vaux, who also planned the elaborate Kingston Point Park, and whose father Calvert Vaux designed Central Park in N.Y.C. In fact, the father may have begun plans for College Hill before his death, but it was the son who exhibited the "General Plan for the Improvement of College Hill Park, Poughkeepsie" before the Architectural League of N.Y. in 1900 and the American Society of Landscape Architects in 1903. The original school building burned in 1917 and was replaced by the smaller replica, the Guilford Dudley Memorial Shelter in 1936. Its architect was John P. Draney of Poughkeepsie. The hill is the highest point in the city and always been a prominent physical feature of the city, easily identified in early prints and drawings. Today, the park is used for skiing and golf, for Fourth of July fireworks and picnics. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION: The boundary of the nominated paxcel is defined by the 350' contour line as indicated on the attached City of Poughkeepsie planometric map. HISTORIC RESOURCES THE CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK Guilford Dudley Memorial (#13) BUILDING 13 , continued College Hill Park 225: 00o c 000 HINALL 400°0 0000D OBOOBO COUL = cE D 0. 0000000 00000 18:0 Do 160 T Ö0098p 07 00 FIEL! 0/1 V/IN 1^> 1' Historic Resources of the City of Poughkeepsie Dutchess County, New York Guilford Dudley Memorial College Hill Park Tax Map #6162.56.450437 5.3 acres City of Poughkeepsie Map 1977 Scale 1"= 400' USGS - Poughkeepsie Quadrangle, New York Scale 1:24,000 UTM #18/590230/4618150 POUGHKEEPSIE" POUGHKEEPSIL NEW HAVEN MORGAN · 134C 0 00g PARKING 00000 s00000 00 000T 0 8c 0 BM 23 water Workse! YO Marian folles in :hland ding ind Oil& Ga Oil and Gasoline DSON BRIDGE TOLL It Carme Fire Ste *gan Columbus ser fellow ¡lue Oil and Gasoline BM Mine ÇEMETERY CENTRAL Norm PETERS § CEMETERY УДОЕННІЙ Vorgan Luke 213 Morse La Seky Sch SMITH BArmory LiSONER 2209 * High Se arling!‹ COLLEGE Vassar™ Temple 33 ' Field Sta J Agington le Srinik навант Vassr Luke Calvary Cemetery TERRIS LECH Sunset Historic Resources of the City of Poughkeepsie Dutchess County, New York Guilford Dudley Memorial College Hill Park Tax Map #6162.56.450437 5,3 acres City of Poughkeepsie Map 1977 Scale 1"= 400' USGS - Poughkeepsie Quadrangle, New York Scale 1:24,000 UTM #18/590230/4618150 Dutchess Golf and Country Club ige Sal Resolution No. 2024125, ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT was postponed until the August 8, 2024, Committee meetings during the July 11, 2024, Environment Committee meeting and then further postponed to the September 5, 2024, Committee meetings, and considered at the September meetings. Roll call vote at that time resulted as follows: AYES: 22 Brendli, Caswell, D'Aquanni, Drago, Faust, Garito, Gorman, Houston, Johnson, Kaul, Kearney, Lawler, McHoul, Metzger, Munn, Paoloni, Polasek, Rolison, Travelpiece, Truitt, Valdés Smith, and Versaci NAYS: ABSENT: 3 Resolution adopted. Atkins, House, and Page Environment Committee Roll Call District District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook District 3 - LaGrange District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill District 24 - Dover and Pawling Present: Absent: Vacant: Motion: V BAILK Name Truitt* Houston* Polasek* Valdés Smith* Atkins* Gorman Lawler D'Aquanni (C) Kaul Paoloni (VC) Page House Total: Abstentions: motion to move to fugust Defeated Yes No 2 3 Absent 4 2 5 3 6 4 4 7 7 No 2024125 7/11/2024 Environment Committee Roll Call District District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook District 3 - LaGrange District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill District 24 - Dover and Pawling Present: Absent: Vacant: 1 Resolution: Motion: Name Truitt* Houston* Polasek* Valdés Smith* Atkins* Gorman Lawler D'Aquanni (C) Kaul Paoloni (VC) Page House Total : Abstentions: Yes No Absent 11 Yes No WT/BL Motion to pootpone to stugust 2024125 7/11/2024 Environment Committee Roll Call District District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook District 3 - LaGrange District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill District 24 - Dover and Pawling Present: Absent: Vacant: Resolution: Motion: Name Truitt* Houston* Polasek* Valdés Smith* Atkins* Gorman Lawler D'Aquanni (C) Kaul Paoloni (VC) Page House Total : Abstentions: Yes No 12 Yes No DH/mP Postpone to september 2024125 ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT AUGUST 8, 2024 Environment Committee Roll Call District District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley Name Truitt* Yes No District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook Houston* District 3 - LaGrange Polasek* District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon Valdés Smith* District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie Atkins* District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie Gorman District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie Lawler District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie D'Aquanni (C) District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie Kaul District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger Paoloni (VC) District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill Page District 24 - Dover and Pawling House Present: 12 Absent: Vacant: Total: Motion: Abstentions: 12 Yes 0 No DH/MP Amendment - Zod Whereas- Replace nine (9) With eight (8) - 54 Whereas-Replace nine (9) with exent (8) - Remove background in fo- Short Environmental Assessment Form pertaing to Colleg Hill, Parts!, a, and 3 9/5|2024 2024125 Environment Committee Roll Call District District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook District 3 - LaGrange District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill District 24 - Dover and Pawling 12 Resolution: Motion: Present: Absent: Vacant: Name Truitt* Houston* Polasek* Valdés Smith* Atkins* Gorman Lawler D'Aquanni (C) Kaul Paoloni (VC) Page House Total: Abstentions: Yes No 12 Yes No 2024125 ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 Roll Call Sheets District Present: Absent: Vacant: District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook District 3 - LaGrange District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 2 - LaGrange, Pleasant Valley & Town of Poughkeepsie District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie District 8 - City and Town of Poughkeepsie District 10 - City of Poughkeepsie District 11 - Clinton, Pleasant Valley, and Rhinebeck District 12 - East Fishkill District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger District 14 - Wappinger and Town of Poughkeepsie District 15 - Wappinger District 17 - Town and Village of Fishkill District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill District 19 - North East, Stanford, Pine Plains, Milan & Red Hook District 20 - Red Hook, Tivoli, and Rhinebeck District 21 - East Fishkill District 22 - Beekman and Union Vale District 23 - Pawling, Beekman and East Fishkill 2 2 3 District 24 - Dover and Pawling Resolution: K Motion: Last Name YES NO Truitt Houston Polasek Valdés Smith Atkins absent Gorman Travelpiece Lawler D'Aquanni Kaul Brendli Johnson Kearney Metzger Paoloni Versaci Faust McHoul Page absent Drago Munn Caswell Garito Rolison House Total: Abrent Yes No Abstentions: _O 2024125 ADOPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORMS AND DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PROJECT SEPTEMBER 9, 2024