countyDutchess County Legislature
2025183
ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONE OF ASSESSMENT “031” IN THE DUTCHESS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF HYDE PARK
- Introduced
- November 9, 2025
- Latest action
- November 9, 2025
- Status
- ADOPTED
- District coverage
- scope: countywide
Document text
Extracted from the official document; OCR may contain errors.
ENVIRONMENT
RE:
RESOLUTION NO. 2025183
ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONNECTION
WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONE OF ASSESSMENT "031"
IN THE DUTCHESS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LOCATED IN
THE TOWN OF HYDE PARK
Legislators D'AQUANNI and GORMAN offer the following and move its adoption:
HEREAS, this Legislature has betore it a resolution together with a map, plan and repot
I prepared by or on behalf of the Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority (WWA
in support of the establishment of Zone "031" by the County of Dutchess ("County") to facilitate
the payment of capital costs through the levy of benefit assessments, and
WHEREAS, as part of its review of the proposed actions the WWA prepared a State
Environmental Quality Review Full Environmental Assessment Form, and adopted a Negative
Declaration and Notice of Determination of Significance dated March 31, 2025 prepared by the
WWA Board on file with the Clerk of the Legislature, which conclude that the proposed project
constitutes an Unlisted Action pursuant to Part 617 of the New York Code of Rules and
Regulations (SEQR), and that the action will not have a significant effect on the environment, and
WHEREAS, it appears that the WWA thoroughly reviewed the proposed action and this
Legislature should confirm those findings, now, therefore, it is hereby
RESOLVED, that this Legislature hereby adopts and confirms the findings of the WWA,
as set forth in the aforementioned State Environmental Quality Review, Negative Declaration and
Notice of Determination of Significance, attached hereto, concluding the proposed action will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
APPROVED
CA-148-25
Sue Serero
G-1217-FF
10/07/25; rev'd 10/20/25
Fiscal Impact: See Attached.
SUSAN J. SERINO
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
Date 11-13 2025
STATE OF NEW YORK
SS:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS
This is to certify that I, the undersigned Clerk of the I egislature of the County of Dutchess, have compared the foregoing resolution with
the original resolution now on file in the office of said clerk, and which was adopted by said legislature on the 10h day of Norember 2025, and that
the same is a truc and correct transcript of said original resolution and of the whole thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hercunto set my hand and scal of said Legislaturd this 10# day of November 2025.
Bujalizgu
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
• NO FISCAL IMPACT PROJECTED
APPROPRIATION RESOLUTIONS
(To be completed by requesting department)
Total Current Year Cost $
Total Current Year Revenue $
and Source
Source of County Funds (check one): Existing Appropriations,
Contingency,
•Transfer of Existing Appropriations,
LI Additional Appropriations, • Other (explain).
Identify Line Items(s):
Related Expenses:
Nature/Reason:
Amount $
Anticipated Savings to County:
Net County Cost (this year):
Over Five Years:
Additional Comments/Explanation:
Prepared by: Jonathan Churins, Executive Director, DCWWA
Prepared On: 10/07/2025
That of
ATEWATER AUTHORITY
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Sue Serino, County Executive
Jonathan Churins, Executive Director Y
Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority
1 Lagrange Avenue
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
845-486-3601 845-486-3656 FAX
[email protected]
Resolution Requests
October 7, 2025
Please find attached a Resolution Request Forms and Fiscal Impact Statements for two resolutions related to the
creation of the County Water District Zone of Assessment "031" (North Park Water).
The DCWWA is requesting that the County establish County Water District Zones of Assessment "031" to provide
water services within a community in the Town of Hyde Park. The DCWWA is proposing an interconnection from its
Hyde Park Regional Water System to its Quaker Hill Water System, with the creation of Zone of Assessment "031"
giving the ability for residential and commercial property owners to connect to the central water main once the
interconnection project is fully complete. A Map, Plan and Report for Zone of Assessment "031" was previously
submitted for review. The DCWWA's ability to establish this new water service area is contingent on the creation
of the Zones of Assessment within the County Water District, encompassing all properties in the System's service
area. The DCWWA is asking the Legislature to pass two resolutions:
• Adoption of SEQR findings related to the Creation of County Water District Zone of Assessment "031", and
• Creation of County Water District Zone of Assessment "031"
The DCWWA intends to submit a resolution request under separate cover for the approval of the Restatement of
the County Water District Service Agreement pertaining to Zone of Assessment "031" and including; Zones "029A"
and "029B", and "030" as all Zones of Assessment pertain to the interconnection project between the Hyde Park
Regional Water System and the Quaker Hill Water System. Said resolution request will be submitted prior to the
December Committee and Legislature Meeting deadline.
Please find attached separate Resolution Request Forms and Fiscal Impact Statements for each of the two actions.
In addition, please find Resolutions 2024087 and 2024088, which can be used as templates for these requested
resolutions.
Cc:
Jason Teed, PE, DCWWA
RESOLUTION NO. 2025.05.G
Authority Board - DCWWA
May 21, 2025 Meeting
Approval to Adopt SEQR Determination for the revised Quaker Hills Water &
to the Hyde Park Regional Water Interconnection
Larry Knapp
_offers the following resolution and moves its adoption:
WHEREAS; the Authority has been awarded a grant and loan financing package through the New York
State Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) to take one of two possible actions to address PFAS
exceedances in the Quaker Hill Water System, in the Town of Hyde Park, NY, and
WHEREAS; by Resolution 2024.04.C the Authority Board declared its intent to act as Lead Agency for
the State Environmental Quality Review ("SEQR") process and directed staff to circulate the
Environmental Assessment Form (Part One) to all involved agencies to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of interconnection of the Quaker Hills Water System to the Hyde Park
Regional Water System (the "Action"), and
WHEREAS; by Resolution 2024.06.BB this Action was classified as "Unlisted" and the Authority Board
adopted a Conditioned Negative Declaration in regards to the State Historic Preservation Office's
(SHPO) request that an additional archeological survey of the area be completed prior to construction
pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA, and
WHEREAS; as detailed in the accompanying memo, Authority Staff have reviewed the results of
the archeological survey and recommend approval by the Board to adopt the SEQR findings for
the proposed water main extension from the Hyde Park Regional Water System to the Quaker Hill
Water System, the acquisition and Zone of Assessment creation of Dutchess Estates Water, the
acquisition and Zone of Assessment creation of South Cross Water, and the Zone of Assessment
creation of the Quaker Hill Water Expansion Area.
WHEREAS; the Authority Board has reviewed the recommendations of the Authority Staff and
considered the benefits to the Authority, and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT; the Authority Board hereby determines that the
interconnection of the Quaker Hill Water System to the Hyde Park Regional Water System will not
have a significant impact on the environment and hereby adopts the attached Negative Declaration
with respect to this matter.
Seconded by Jennifer Cannella
Record of Vote:
Aye
Nay
Thomas LeGrand
Rudy Vavra (Absent)
Larry Knapp
Dale Borchert (Absent)
Jennifer Cannella
HATER ANI
ASTEWATER AUTHORIT'
MEMORANDUM
May 21, 2025
To: Authority Board
From:
Jason Teed, PE, Project Manager
Subject:
Dutchess Estates Water, South Cross Water Area, and Quaker Expansion Area -
Zones of Assessment Creation- SEQR Findings
On March 31 2025, the DCWWA circulated a notice of intent to act as Lead Agency for SEQR review of the Quaker
Hill Water to Hyde Park Regional Interconnection Project. This was a revision to the SEQR circulated on April 24,
2024 to include following additional information:
• All potential locations for a Booster Pump Station in lieu of the previous location at the North Storage
Tank.
• All potential locations for a water storage facility as no tank was previously proposed.
• The acquisition of the Dutchess Estates Water System, distribution system only, including Zone of
Assessment creation
• The acquisition of the South Cross Water System, entire infrastructure, including Zone of Assessment
creation
• The Zone of Assessment creation designated as the Quaker Hill Water Expansion (QEW) that includes any
and all parcels along several alternative routes between the Hyde Park Regional Water System and the
Quaker Hill Water System.
A copy of the Full EAF from April 24, 2024 and the revised Full EAF from March 31, 2025 SEQR circulations are
provided in the Board packet.
Authority Staff recommend approval by the Board of the accompanying resolution to adopt the SEQR findings for
the proposed water main extension from the Hyde Park Regional Water System to the Quaker Hill Water System,
the acquisition and Zone of Assessment creation of Dutchess Estates Water, the acquisition and Zone of
Assessment creation of South Cross Water, and the Zone of Assessment creation of the Quaker Hill Water
Expansion Area.
On May 14, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced changes to its final PFAS drinking
water regulations. The agency is maintaining strict, enforceable limits for PFOA and PFOS at 4 parts per trillion,
but it is rescinding limits for four other PFAS compounds: GenX, PFHxS, PFBS, and PNA. In addition, the deadline
for compliance with the new PFOA and PFOS limits has been extended from 2029 to 2031. While these changes
may affect how utilities nationwide plan for long-term PFAS compliance, the federal health standard for PFOA and
PFOS remains unchanged. As such, this announcement does not change the need for our ongoing capital projects
to provide alternative source water for the Quaker Hill Water System, which are necessary to address confirmed
PFOA/PFOS contamination and ensure protection of public health.
RESOLUTION NO. 2024.06.BB
Authority Board - DCWWA
June 5, 2024 Special Meeting
Approval of Quaker Hills Water System SEQR Determination
Interconnection to the Hyde Park Regional Water System
Dale Borchert
_offers the following resolution and moves its adoption:
WHEREAS; the Authority is preparing to apply for New York State (NYS) financing through the
Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) to take one of two possible actions to address PFAS
exceedances in the Quaker Hill Water System, in the Town of Hyde Park, NY, and
WHEREAS; by Resolution 2024.04.C the Authority Board declared its intent to act as Lead Agency for
the State Environmental Quality Review ("SEQR") process and directed staff to circulate the
Environmental Assessment Form (Part One) to all involved agencies to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts of interconnection of the Quaker Hills Water System to the Hyde Park
Regional Water System (the "Action"), and
WHEREAS; the Environmental Assessment Form has been completed and submitted to the Authority
Board for its review, and
WHEREAS; in accordance with the requirements of the SEQR, the Authority's Board of Directors must
make a determination as to the Environmental Impact of this proposed Action, and
WHEREAS; the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has requested that additional archeological
survey of the area be completed prior to construction, and
WHEREAS; this Action has been classified as "Unlisted" with the condition that archeological survey
will be addressed at a later date pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA, and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT; the Authority Board declares itself as Lead Agency for this Action,
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT; the Authority Board hereby determines that the interconnection of
the Quaker Hill Water System to the Hyde Park Regional Water System will not have a significant
impact on the environment and hereby adopts the attached Conditioned Negative Declaration with
respect to this matter.
Seconded by Larry Knapp
Record of Vote:
Aye
Nay
Thomas LeGrand
-
Rudy Vavra (Absent)
Larry Knapp
-
Dale Borchert
-
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1 - Project and Setting
Instructions for Completing Part 1
Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,
are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to
any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist,
or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to
update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that
contained in Part lis accurate and complete.
A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information.
Name of Action or Project:
Hyde Park Regional Water System (HPRWS) and Quaker Hill Water System Interconnection
Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map):
Continuous Right-of-Way (North Quaker Lane, Fall Kill Road, NYS Route 9G, Mill Road, Howard Blvd, Hudson Drive) Hyde Park, NY 12538
Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need):
Name of Applicant/Sponsor:
Dutchess County Wastewater Authority (DWWA)
Address: 1 LaGrange Avenue
City/PO: Poughkeepsie
Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role):
Address:
City/PO:
Property Owner (if not same as sponsor):
N/A in public right-of-way
Address:
City/PO:
[Telephone: 845-486-3623
E-Mail: [email protected]
State: NY
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Zip Code: 12603
State:
Telephone:
E-Mail:
| Zip Code:
State:
[Zip Code:
Page 1 of 13
FEAF 2019
B. Government Approvals
B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. ("Funding" includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial
assistance.)
Government Entity
If Yes: Identify Agency and Approvals)
Required
Application Date
(Actual or projected)
a. City Council, Town Board,
or Village Board of Trustees
b. City, Town or Village
Planning Board or Commission
c. City, Town or
Village Zoning Board of Appeals
d. Other local agencies
Yes•No
Perm of Hyde Park Planning Board: Special
Nov - Dec 2025 (projected)
ZIYes•No
e. County agencies
Hyde Park Highway Dept: Town of Hyde Par
treet Opening Permit; Bldg Dept: Bldg Perm
itchess County DBCH, Dutchess County DP'
itchess County Planning Boa
Nov - Dec 2025 (projected)
Nov - Dec 2025 (projected)
f. Regional agencies
g. State agencies
h. Federal agencies
Yes•No
NYSDOT: highway work permit: SHPO; NYSDOH: Nov - Dec 2025 (projected)
NYSEFC
i. Coastal Resources.
i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?
•YestZNo
ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program?
iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?
•Yes No
C. Planning and Zoning
C.1. Planning and zoning actions.
Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be theO]YesZNo
only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?
If Yes, complete sections C, F and G.
If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1
C.2. Adopted land use plans.
a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plans) include the site
•YesZ No
where the proposed action would be located?
If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action
•Yes• No
would be located?
b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway;
Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan;
or other?)
If Yes, identify the plan(s):
c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan,
or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?
If Yes, identify the plan(s):
Page 2 of 13
C.3. Zoning
a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.
If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district?
Yes•No
The proposed project passes through five zoning districts including: NEIGHBORHOOD (N), GREENBELT (GB), NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS
(NBD), NEIGHBORHOOD CORE (NC), EAST PARK BUSINESS DISTRICT (EPBD)
b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?
c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?
If Yes,
i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site?
C.4. Existing community services.
a. In what school district is the project site located? Hyde Park CSD
b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site?
Hyde Park Police Department, Dutchess County Sheriff, and New York State Troopers
c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?
Roosevelt Fire District and Hyde Park Fire Department
d. What parks serve the project site?
Hyde Park Recreation and Parks
•YesE No
D. Project Details
D.1. Proposed and Potential Development
a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all
components)? N/A: Utility Work
b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?
3.7 acres
+/-6.7 acres
3.7 acres
• Note: = 36,000 If of water main will
be installed within existing ROW!
easements. The proposed pump
anio pari located as 3. acres.
• YestZ No
c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?
i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units.
square feet)? %
d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision?
•Yes ZNo
If Yes,
i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (c.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types)
ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed?
iii. Number of lots proposed?
iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum
Maximum
e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases?
•Yes No
i. If No, anticipated period of construction:
12 months
ii. If Yes:
• Total number of phases anticipated
• Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition)
• Anticipated completion date of final phase
month
month
_ year
_year
Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may
determine timing or duration of future phases:
Page 3 of 13
f. Does the project include new residential uses?
If Yes, show numbers of units proposed.
One Family
Two Family
Three Family
Multiple Family (four or more)
Initial Phase
At completion
of all phases
%. Does the proposed action include new non-residen ial construction (including expansions)?
i. Total number of structures
ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure:
12' height;
16' width; and _
24 length
ili. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled:
390 square feet
h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any
liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage?
•YesZNo
i. Purpose of the impoundment:
ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water:
• Ground water Surface water streams Other specify:
iii. If other than water, identity the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source.
iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment.
Volume:
_ million gallons; surface area:
acres
v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure:
height;
vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (c.g. carth fill, rock, wood, conerete):
D.2. Project Operations
a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? •Yes/No
(Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated
materials will remain onsite)
i. What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging?
ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site?
• Volume (specify tons or cubic yards):
• Over what duration of time?
ili. Describe nature and characteristies of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them.
iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials?
If yes, describe.
v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated?
vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time?
ii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging
iii. Will the excavation require blasting"
ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan:
_acres
_ acres
feet
b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment
into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area?
i descriy he vetland or waterbody which would be affected by name: water index number, wetland map number or geographic
Page 4 of 13
ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, c.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or
alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres:
iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments?
iv: Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?
• acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed:
• expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:
• purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access):
• proposed method of plant removal:
if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify products):
v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance:
c. Will the proposed action usc, or create a new demand for water?
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day:
il. Will the proposed action oblain water from an existing public water supply?
If Yes:
•
Name of district or service area:
• Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal?
• Is the project site in the existing district?
• Is expansion of the district needed?
• Do existing lines serve the project site?
ili. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project?
If Yes:
gallons/day
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
• Source(s) of supply for the district:
iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site?
If. Yes:
Applicant/sponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
• Proposed source(s) of supply for new district:
v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project:
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
DYesENo
•Yes•No
•Yes• No
•Yes• No
•Yes•No
•Yes• No
•Yes•No
• Yes•No
vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity:
. gallons/minute.
d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes?
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day:
gallons/day
ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g.. sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and
approximate volumes or proportions of each):
ill. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?
If Yes:
Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _
Name of district:
Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project?
Is the project site in the existing district?
•
Is expansion of the district needed?
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
•YesNo
Page 5 of 13
•
Do existing sewer lines serve the project site
• Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?
LIYesNo
If Yes:
Applicant/sponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge?
. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying propose
eceiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans)
vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste:
e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point
sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point
source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction?
ØYes•No
i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel?
390 Square feet or
acres (impervious surface)
Square feet or 3.67 acres (parcel size)
. Describe types of new point sources!
Ape wiseal beat euig owl bays, valeno new pe ous site. The rest of the interconnection
ili. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties,
groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
To the ground surface
• If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands:
Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?
iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?
Yes No
f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel
combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations?
If Yes, identify:
i. Mobile sources during project operations (c.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles)
ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers)
ili. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, clectric generation)
g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,
or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?
i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet
nbient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year
In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generat
'ons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO,
ons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (NO
ns/vear (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFC
ins/vear (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SI
Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs)
Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)
•YestZNo
•Yes•No
Page 6 of 13
h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,
landfills, composting facilities)?
If Yes:
i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric):
ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (c.g., combustion to generate heat or
electricity, flaring):
i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as
quarry or landfill operations?
If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (c.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust):
j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial
new demand for transportation facilities or services?
LIYes No
i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): • Morning
• Evening
•Weekend
• Randomly between hours of
ii. For commercial activities only. projected number of truck trips/day and type (eg. semi trailers and dump trucks):
iti. Parking spaces:
Existing
Proposed
Net increase/decrease
iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking?
•YesONo
v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe:
vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site?
vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric
or other alternative fueled vehicles?
viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing
pedestrian or bicycle routes?
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
K. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand
for energy?
i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action:
124,000 kWh
ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (c.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or
other):
Grid/Local Utility
ili. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation?
•YesaNo
1. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply.
i. During Construction:
•
Monday - Friday:
•
Saturday:
•
Sunday:
•
Holidays:
7:00AM-5:00PM
none
none
none
ii. During Operations:
Monday - Friday:
Saturday:
Sunday:_
Holidays:
24/7
24/7
24/7
24/7
Page 7 of 13
m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,
operation, or both?
i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration:
Construction will occur M-F between 7:00AM - 5:00PM, excluding holidays.
ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen?
•YesZNo
Describe:
n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting?
Z Yes •No
If yes:
i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures:
Wall mounted light fixtures are proposed approximately 8-10' above ground level, above the new main entrance of the proposed booster pump
station. The proposed lighting will be dark sky compliant.
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen?
Describe:
o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?
If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest
occupied structures:
•YesZNo
p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons)
or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage?
•YesZNo
(e.g., month, year)
iii. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:
q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides,
insecticides) during construction or operation?
If Yes:
i. Describe proposed treatments):
• Yes ZNo
ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?
r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal
of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)?
If Yes:
i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility:
• Construction:
tons per
_ (unit of time)
• Operation :
(unit of time)
ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste:
• Construction:
• Operation:
ili. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:
Construction:
• Operation:
• Yes •No
• Yes Z No
Page 8 of 13
s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?
• Yes 2 No
If Yes:
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (c.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or
other disposal activities):
ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
•
Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or
Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment
ili. If landfill, anticipated site life:
years
t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous •Yes/ No
If Yes:
i. Namc(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility:
ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents:
iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated
tons/month
iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents:
v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?
If Yes: provide name and location of facility:
If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:
•YesONo
E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action
E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site
a. Existing land uses.
i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site.
• Urban
Industrial
7 Commercial
M Residential (suburban)
• Rural (non-farm)
7 Forest
• Agriculture • Aquatic
M Other (specify): Right-of-way
ii. If mix of uses, generally describe:
he project is a linear roadwork project proposed to connect the Quaker Hill Water System to the Hyde Park Regional Water System, and includes the
onstruction of a booster pump station structure adiacent to an existing drinking water North Tank
b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or
Covertype
•
Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious
surfaces
•
•
Forested
Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non-
agricultural, including abandoned agricultural)
•
Agricultural
(includes active orchards, field, greenhouse ctc.)
Surface water features
(lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, ctc.)
•
•
•
Wetlands (freshwater or tidal)
Non-vegetated (bare rock, carth or fill)
Other
Describe:
Current
Acreage
24.00
3.67
Acreage After
Project Completion
24.01
3.67
Change
(Acres +/-)
+0.01
0.00
0.80
0.81
+0.01
Page 9 of 13
c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?
i. If Yes: explain:
d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (c.g., schools, hospitals, licensed
day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site?
DYesENO
EYes•No
Franklin D. Roosevelt High School, North Park Elementary School, Creative Gardens Day Care
e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?
If Yes:
•
i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:
Dam height:
Dam length:
•
Surface arca:
•
Volume impounded:
ii. Dam's existing hazard classification:
iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
feet
feet
acres
_ gallons OR acre-feet
f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,
or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility?
i. Has the facility been formally closed?
• If yes, cite sources/documentation:
ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility:
•Yes• No
iti. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities:
. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoi
roperty which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste
i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred:
h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any
remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?
i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site
Remediation database? Check all that apply:
• Yes - Spills Incidents database
• Yes - Environmental Site Remediation database
Provide DEC ID numbers):
Provide DEC ID numbers):
• Neither database
ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:
ill. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?
If yes, provide DEC ID number(s):
iv. If yes to (i). (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s):
•YesONo
•Yes•No
Page 10 of 13
v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?
•
If yes, DEC site ID number:
Describe the type of institutional control (c.g., deed restriction or casement):
•
Describe any usc limitations:
Describe any engineering controls:
Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?
Explain:
•YesONo
•Yes•No
E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site
a. What is the avcrage depth to bedrock on the project site?
b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?
If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings?
c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site:
Nassau Cardigan Complex
Sun Silt Loam
d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average:
c. Drainage status of project site soils: 2 Well Drained:
Moderately Well Drained:
• Poorly Drained
f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes:
>7 feet
96% of site
_% of site
_% of site
0-10%:
10-15%:
• 15% or greater:
2 feet
5%
96 %
4%
%
Note: Information in E.2.a-g is
relative to the North Storage Tank
Parcel only
50% of site
30% of site
20% of site
g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?
If Yes, describe:
h. Surface water features.
i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,
ponds or lakes)?
ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?
If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i.
ili. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,
state or local agency?
iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information:
Streams:
Name
862-412, 862-411, 862-415, 862-415.1. 862-393, 862-398. 862-398.1
Classification A(T). C
Lakes or Ponds:
Name
Name Federal Waters, NYS Wetland
DYesONo
ZYesDNo
acres):19.3, NYS Wetland (in acres): 42.0
MYes•No
waterbodies?
If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired:
Name - Pollutants - Uses: Fall Kill and tribs - Nutrients - Recreation; Aquatic
i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway?
j. Is the project site in the 100-ycar Floodplain?
k. Is the project site in the 500-ycar Floodplain?
I. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?
If Yes:
i. Name of aquifer: Principal Aquifer
DYes•No
DYes•No
Page 11 of 13
m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site:
frogs
squirrel
turtles
various bird species
deer
chipmunk
n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?
i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation):
Red Maple-Hardwood Swamp, Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest
ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation:
iii. Extent of community/habitat:
Currently:
Following completion of project as proposed:
• Gain or loss (indicate + or -):
102.0, 749.66
acres
acres
acres
o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as
endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species?
If Yes:
i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened):_
Blanding's Turtle, Indiana Bat
MYes•No
p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of
special concern?
If Yes:
i. Species and listing:
DYes/No
q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?
If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use:
E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site
a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to
Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?
If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: DUTC020
b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?
i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site?
ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s):
c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National
Natural Landmark?
i. Nature of the natural landmark:
• Biological Community
• Geological Feature
ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent:
d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area?
If Yes:
i. CEA name: Hogback Hill
ii. Basis for designation: Sensitivity to change & habitat and species protection
ili. Designating agency and date: Agency: Hyde Park, Town of, Date: 6-7-2009
Page 12 of 13
c. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archacological site, or district
Yes No
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS
Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places?
If Yes:
Note: Project submittec
i. Nature of historic/archacological resource: Archaeological Site
Historic Building or District
to SHPO on 4/17/2024
ii. Name: Stoutenburgh, William House, Quaker Lane Farms
Awaiting response.
iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based:
William S. House: Historic Home 18th Century: Quaker Lane Farm: historic farm/agricultural property dating back te the late 19th Century.
T. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for
DYesNo
archacological sites on the NY State Historic Prescrvation Office (SHPO) archacological site inventory?
g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?
•YesZNo
If Yes:
i. Describe possible resource(s):
ii. Basis for identification:
h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local
scenic or acsthetic resource?
ØYes[No
i. Identify resource: Black Creek Preserve, Riverfront Park, Hyde Park Rec, Pinewoods Park, Roosevelt Farm Lane Trail, Staatsburg Pk Playground
ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (c.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historie trail or scenic byway,
etc.): local parks and scenic riverfront locations
iii. Distance between project and resource:
O and 5 miles.
i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers
Program 6 NYCRR 666?
If Yes:
i. Identify the name of the river and its designation:
ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?
F. Additional Information
Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any
measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification
I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.
Michael J Keating
Applicant/Sponsor Name
Signature
5/31/2024
Date
Title Executive Director
PRINT FORM
Page 13 of 13
EAF Mapper Summary Report
Thursday, April 18, 2024 9:33 AM
Staatsburg
Clinton:
Esopus
Piet a
hany
Hyde Park
Hyde Park
Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are
answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF
question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order
to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a
substitute for agency determinations.
Sound
Broile
Bame
Kingston
Montpe
Toronto
Hamilton
Rochester
Buttalo
New Paltz
Pleasant Valley
Albany
Thailand NGCC Te Oper StreetMap cortiatos and the GIS
User Commont), Esn HERE Germin Masters, NAS
B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area]
B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area
C.2.b. [Special Planning District]
E. 1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -
Potential Contamination History]
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -
Listed]
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -
Environmental Site Remediation Database]
E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation
Site]
E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features]
E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features]
E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features]
E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features]
No
No
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and
waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream
862-412, 862-411, 862-415, 862-415.1, 862-393, 862-398, 862-398.1
Name]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream
A(T), C
Classification]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Federal Waters, NYS Wetland
Namel
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres):70.5, NYS Wetland (in acres): 18.2, NYS Wetland (in
acres):19.3, NYS Wetland (in acres):42.0
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC
HP-12, HP-40, HP-15, SP-19
Wetlands Number]
E.2.h.v [impaired Water Bodies]
Yes
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report
E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies - Name and
Name - Pollutants - Uses:Fall Kill and tribs - Nutrients - Recreation;Aquatic
Basis for Listing]
Life
E.2.i. [Floodway]
Yes
E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain]
Yes
E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain]
Yes
E.2.I. [Aquifers]
Yes
E.2.I. [Aquifer Names]
Principal Aquifer
E.2.n. [Natural Communities]
Yes
E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name]
Red Maple-Hardwood Swamp, Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest
E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres]
102.0, 749.66
E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species]
Yes
E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Blanding's Turtle, Indiana Bat
Name]
E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals]
E.3.a. [Agricultural District]
E.3.a. [Agricultural District]
E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark]
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area - Name]
E.3.d.ii [Critical Environmental Area -
No
Yes
DUTC020
No
Yes
Hogback Hill
Sensitivity to change & habitat and species protection
Reason]
E.3.d.iii [Critical Environmental Area - Date
Agency:Hyde Park, Town of, Date:6-7-2009
and Agency]
E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic
Yes - Digital mapping data for archaeological site boundaries are not
Places or State Eligible Sites]
available. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.3.e.ii [National or State Register of Historic Stoutenburgh, William, House, Quaker Lane Farms
Places or State Eligible Sites - Name]
E.3.f. [Archeological Sites]
E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor]
Yes
No
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report
Kill
HML0609
de
LEGEND
Proposed Interconnection Route
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION
Hyde Park - Quaker Hill
Interconnection Analysis
Hyde Park, New York
Tighe&Bond
Based on uses Tondenhe Man el
Circles inficase 500-foet and hal'emile rous
1:26,400
1,100
Feet
2,200
April 2024
• Puny Station Sit
ANORESTAT
2N70310804)
NOTE LANDING
BILE HOME PAR:
(N70102460)
(0208023020
300220:
EMENTARY SCH
(NY13(3163))
Quaker Hills
Water System
Route B
KNIGHTS OF
COLUMBUS HYDE
-(SX0321980)
LEGEND
Approximate Parcel Boundary Proposed Interconnection Route
; Town Boundary
Existing Quaker Hill Water Main
Surounding PWS
Existing Hyde Park Water Main
ALTERNATIVE 1
INTERCONNECTION ROUTES
1:21,600
900
1,800
Tighe&Bond
Hyde Park - Quaker Hill
Interconnection Analysis
Hyde Park, New York
April 2024
Agency Use Only |If applicable]
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts
Project:
Date:
e aftected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead :
professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that
can be answered using the information found in Part I. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the
most relevant questions in Part I that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the
lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity.
If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
Tips for completing Part 2:
•
Review all of the information provided in Part I.
Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook.
•
Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2.
• If you answer "Yes" to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section.
• If you answer "No" to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question.
• Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact.
• Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency
checking the box "Moderate to large impact may occur."
• The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis.
• If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the gencral
question and consult the workbook.
• When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the "whole action".
• Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts.
•
Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project.
1.
Impact on Land
Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of,
the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.I)
ONO
EYES
If "Yes", answer questions a - j. If "No", move on to Section 2.
Relevant
Part I
Question(s)
No, or
small
impact
may occur
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is
less than 3 feet.
E2d
b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater.
E20
E2a
c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or
generally within S feet of existing ground surface.
d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons
D2a
of natural material.
c. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year
DIe
or in multiple phases.
f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical
D2c. D2g
disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides).
g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area.
Bli
h. Other impacts: None
L
C
Page 1 of 10
FEAF 2019
2. Impact on Geological Features
The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit
access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes,
minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g)
If "Yes", answer questions a - c. If "No", move on to Section 3.
VINO
•YES
a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached:
Relevan
Part I
Question(s)
E2g
E3c
Moderate
to large
impact
impact may
may occur
occur
b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a
registered National Natural Landmark.
Specific feature:
c. Other impacts:
3.
Impacts on Surface Water
The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water
bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h)
If "Yes",
answer questions a - l. If "No",
, move on to Section 4.
ONO
Relevant
Part I
Question(s)
a. The proposed action may create a new water body.
D26, Dih
b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a
D2b
10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water.
c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material
D2a
from a wetland or water body.
d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or
E2h
tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body.
e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion,
D2a, D2h
runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments.
f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2e
of water from surface water.
g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfalls) for discharge
D2d
of wastewater to surface water(s).
h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of
D2C
stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving
water bodies.
i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or
E2h
downstream of the site of the proposed action.
j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or
D2q, E2h
around any water body.
k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing,
Dia, D2d
wastewater treatment facilities.
Page 2 of 10
No, or
small
impact
may occur
[YES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•
L
I. Other impacts: None
4. Impact on groundwater
The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or
may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer.
(See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t)
If "Yes", answer questions a - h. If "No". move on to Section 5.
VINO
DYES
Relevant
Part I
Question(s)
a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand
D2c
on supplies from existing water supply wells.
b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable
D2c
withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer.
Cite Source:
c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in arcas without water and
Dla, D2c
sewer services.
d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater.
c. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations
where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated.
D2d, E2l
D2c, EIF,
E1g, Elh
D2p, E21
f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products
over ground water or an aquifer.
g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100
feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources.
E2h, D2q.
E21, D20
h. Other impacts:
No, or
small
impact
may occur
Moderate
impact may
uri
Impact on Flooding
The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding.
(See Part I. E.2)
If "Yes", answer questions a - g. !f "No", move on to Section 6.
AYES
a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway.
b. The proposed action may result in declopment within a 100 year floodplain.
c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain.
d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage
patterns.
Relevant
Part 1
Question(s)
E2i
E2j
E2k
D2b, D2e
e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding.
D2b, E2i,
E2j. E2k
f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair,
Ele
or upgrade?
Page 3 of 10
No, or
small
impact
may occur
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•
•
•
g. Other impacts: None
•
6.
Impacts on Air
The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source.
(See Part I. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g)
!! "Yes", answer questions a - f. If "No", move on to Section 7.
VINO
Relevant
Part I
Questions)
No, or
small
impact
may occur
OYES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may
also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels:
i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (COz)
i. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (NO)
iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SFo)
v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of
hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions
vi. 43 tons/ycar or more of methane
b. The proposed action may gencrate 10 tons/ycar or more of any one designated
hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous
air pollutants.
c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions
rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 Ibs. per hour, or may include a heat
source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in "a" through "c",
above.
e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1
ton of refuse per hour.
f. Other impacts:
D2g
D2g
D2g
D2g
D2g
D2h
D2g
D2f, D2g
D2g
D2s
• 00
0
0
7.
Impact on Plants and Animals
The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part I. E.2. m.-q.)
If "Yes", answer questions a - j. If "No", move on to Section 8.
a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any
threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal
government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by
any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal
government.
c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any
species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the
Federal government, that use the sitc, or are found on, over, or near the site.
d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by
any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or
the Federal government.
Page 4 of 10
Relevant
Part
Question(s)
E20
E20
E2p
E2p
•NOR
No, or
small
impact
may occur
MYES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural
Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect.
f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any
portion of a designated significant natural community.
g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or
over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site.
h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest,
grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat.
Habitat type & information source:
i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of
herbicides or pesticides.
j. Other impacts: None
E.30
E2n
E2m
Elb
8.
Impact on Agricultural Resources
The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part I. E.3.a. and b.)
If "Yes", answer questions a - h. If "No", move on to Section 9
a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the
NYS Land Classification System.
b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land
(includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc).
c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of
active agricultural land.
d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural
uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10
acres if not within an Agricultural District.
c. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land
management system.
f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development
potential or pressure on farmland.
g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland
Protection Plan.
h. Other impacts:
Zelevan
Part
Question(s)
E2c, E3b
Ela, Elb
ЕЗЬ
Elb, E3a
Ela, Elb
:2c, C3.
)2c, D2L
C2c
Page 5 of 10
ONO
impact
may occur
•
EYES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•
9.
Impact on Aesthetic Resources
The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in
sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and
a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.I.a, E.I.b, E.3.h.)
If "Yes".
" answer questions a - g. !! "No", go to Section 10.
VINO
•YES
a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, statc, or local
scenic or aesthetic resource.
b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant
screening of one or more officially designated scenic views.
The proposed action may be visible from Du
hearoposed action man be bysile fertubicy accessib vantage porseasons
ii. Year round
d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed
action is:
i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work
ii. Recreational or tourism based activities
c. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and
appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource.
f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed
project:
0-1/2 mile
½-3 mile
3-5 mile
5+ mile
g. Other impacts:
Relevant
Part I
Question(s)
E3h
E3h, C26
E3h
E3h
E2q,
Elc
E3h
Dia, Ela,
DIE, DIg
No, or
small
impact
may oceur
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources
The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archacological
resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.)
If "Yes", answer questions a - e. !f "No" go to Section 11.
•NO
Relevan
Part I
Question(s)
a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous
to, any buildings, archacological site or district which is listed on the National or
E3e
tate Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissione
f the NYS Office of Parks. Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible fo
listing on the State Register of Historic Places.
. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous | E3
), an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Histori
Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory.
c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g
1o, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory.
Source:
V YES
No, or
small
impact
may occur.
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•
Page 6 of 10
d. Other impacts: None
If any of the above (a-d) are answered "Moderate to large impact may
". occur", continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3:
The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part
of the site or property.
ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or
integrity.
iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which
are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting.
11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation
The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or :
reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adoptec
municipal open space plan.
(See Part 1. C.2.c, E.I.c., E.2.q.)
If "Yes". answer questions a - e. If "No" go to Section 12.
a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or "ecosystem
services", provided by an undeveloped arca, including but not limited to stormwater
storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat.
b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource.
c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an arca
with few such resources.
d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the
community as an open space resource.
e. Other impacts:
12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas
The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical
environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d)
If "Yes", answer questions a - c. If "No",
" go to Section 13.
a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or
characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or
characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA.
c. Other impacts: None
Page 7 of 10
E3e, E3g,
E3f
E3c, E3f,
E3g, Ela,
EIb
E3c, E3f,
E3g, E3h,
C2, C3
ENO
YES
Relevant
Part
Question(s)
D2e, ЕЛЬ
E2h,
E2m, E2o,
E2n, E2p
C2a, Elc.
C2c, E24
C2a, C2c
Elc, E2q
C2c. Ele
No, or
Moderate
small
to large
impact
impact may
may occur
occur
• NO
Relevant
Part 1
Question(s)
E3d
E3d
No, or
small
impact
may occur
EYES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•
•
13. Impact on Transportation
The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems.
(See Part I. D.2.j)
!! "Yes", answer questions a -f. I "No": go to Section 14.
a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network.
b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or
more vehicles.
c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access.
d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations.
e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods.
f. Other impacts:
14. Impact on Energy
The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy.
(See Part 1. D.2.k)
If "Yes", answer questions a - e. If "No",
, go to Section 15.
VINO
Relevant
Part I
Question(s)
D2j
D2j
D2j
D2j
D2j
No, or
small
impact
may occur
YES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•NO
elevan
Part
Question(s)
a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation.
b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission
or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a
commercial or industrial use.
c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 Mhrs per year of electricity.
D2k
d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square
Dig
feet of building area when completed.
e. Other Impacts: None
D2k
DIE,
Diq, D2K
No, or
small
impact
may occur
AYES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
D
L
15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light
The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting.
(See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.)
If "Yes", answer questions a - f. If "No", go to Section 16.
a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local
regulation.
0. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence.
lospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home.
c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day.
Page 8 of 10
UNO
Relevant
Part l
Question(s)
D2m
D2m, Eld
D20
No, or
small
impact
may occur
MYES
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
•
d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties.
c. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing
area conditions.
f. Other impacts: None
D2n
D2n, Ela
•
16. Impact on Human Health
The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure
to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part I.D.2.q. E.I.d. f. g. and h.)
If "Yes", answer questions a - m. If "No", go to Section 17.
I NO
MYES
Relevant
Part I
Question(s)
a The propose action me ated i home so fit a co, hial, licensed day
Eld
b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation.
c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site
Elg, Elh
(Elg, Elh
remediation on, or adjacent to. the site of the proposed action.
d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the
Elg, Elh
property (c.g., casement or deed restriction).
c. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place
Elg, Elh
to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health.
C. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future
D2t
generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the
environment and human health.
g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste
D2q, EIT
management facility.
h. The proposed action may result in the uncarthing of solid or hazardous waste.
D24, EIf
i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of
D2r, D2s
solid waste.
j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of
EIf, lg
a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste.
Elh
k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill
EIf, Elg
site to adjacent off site structures
I. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the
D2s, EIf,
project site.
in. Other impacts: None
No,or
small
impact
may cecur
Moderate
to large
impact may
occur
L
Г
•
Page 9 of 10
17. Consistency with Community Plans
The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans.
(See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.)
If "Yes", answer questions a - h. If "No", go to Section 18.
a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp
contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s).
b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village
in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%.
c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations.
d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use
plans.
c. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not
supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure.
f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development
that will require new or expanded public infrastructure.
g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (c.g., residential or
commercial development not included in the proposed action)
h. Other:
VINO
elevat
art
Questions)
C2, C3, Dia
Ela, E1b
C2
C2, C2, C3
C2, 02
C3, DIc.
Old, DIf
DId, Elb
C4, D2c, D2d
D2j
C2a
No, or
small
impact
may occur
]YES
Moderate
to large
impaet may
occur
18. Consistency with Community Character
The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character.
(See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3)
If "Yes", answer questions a - g. If "No",
" proceed to Part 3.
a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas
of historic importance to the community.
b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (c.g.
schools, police and fire)
c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where
there is a shortage of such housing.
d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized
or designated public resources.
e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and
f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape.
g. Other impacts:
VINO
Relevant
Part I
Questions)
E3c, E3f, E3g
C4
C2, C3, DIf
Dig, Ela
C2, E3
C2, C3
C2.C3
Ela, Elb
E2g. E2h
•YES
No, or
Moderate
small
to large
impact
impact may
may occur
occur
0
PRINT FULL FORM
Page 10 of 10
Agency Use Only (IfApplicable]
Project:
Date:
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts
and
Determination of Significance
art 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every questio
1 Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particula
element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact.
ased on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further asses:
he proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will no
have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its
determination of significance.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
To complete this section:
• Identity the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity,
size or extent of an impact.
Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impa
curring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were
occur.
The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes.
• Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where
there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse
environmental impact.
Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact
• For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modity the proposed action so that
no significant adverso environmental impacts will result.
Attach additional sheets, as needed.
See attached.
Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Unlisted
SEOR Status:
• Type 1
Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: V Part 1
•Part 2
Part 3
FEAF 2019
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information
and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the
_ as lead agency that:
A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact
statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued.
B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or
substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency:
he State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has requested an archaeological survey to identity any archaeologically significant resources in the are
rior to start of work. The requested archaeological survey will be completed, if required, so that the interconnection main route can avoid or substantial
mitigate adverse impacts.
There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative
declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.7(d)).
.. This Project mav result in one or more significant advers
nore signity an adVerse impact one cuments a Special Meeting Doc
statement must be prepared to further assess the impacts) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those
impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued.
Name of Action: Hyde Park Regional Water System (HPRWS) and Quaker Hill Water System Interconnection
Name of Lead Agency: Dutchess County Wastewater Authority (DCWWA)
Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Michael J. Keating, P.E.
Title of Responsible Officer: Executive Director
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency:
Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) 22 Vet
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Daniel Valentine
Address: 47 W. Market Street, Rhinebeck, NY
Telephone Number: 845.516.5872
E-mail: [email protected]
Date: 6/6/24
Date: 5/31/24
For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to:
Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (c.g., Town / City / Village of)
Other involved agencies (if any)
Applicant (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.html
PRINT FULL FORM
Page 2 of 2
Impact on Land
The proposed action will involve construction on, and physical alteration of,
the land surface of the proposed site. The proposed construction is anticipated
to occur for a duration of approximately twelve (12) months, or in one phase.
The proposed action involves installation of a new 8-inch water main
(approximately 36,000 linear feet) to connect the Quaker Hill Water System
to the Hyde Park Regional Water System.
The Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority (DCWWA) will install
the approximately 36,000 linear feet of new 8-inch water main to the east of
the existing Quaker Hill Water Main which will follow the continuous right-of-
way in a northerly direction along North Quaker Lane and turn in a westerly
to southwesterly direction following Fall Kill Road, NYS Route 9G, Mill Road,
Howard Boulevard, and Hudson Drive. In addition, a new booster pump station
will be installed at the existing North Water Storage Tank parcel. The new
water main and pump station will require excavation of rock and earth
material. The work will be in the NYSDOT and Town of Hyde Park rights-of-
way, properties owned or controlled via easement by DCWWA and will require
approximately 6.7 acres of surface disturbance for the water main trench. The
existing North Water Storage Tank site (site of the proposed booster pump
station) totals 3.67 acres, located at 56 Hudson Drive, Hyde Park, New York,
Dutchess County, 12538 (Tax ID: 133200-6165-01-136698-0000). The
project will not use or create new demand for water.
The installation of the water main is proposed predominately via directional
drilling, which is generally considered to have lower impacts on the
environment compared to traditional open-cut methods. Directional drilling
involves minimal surface disturbance as it only requires small entry and exit
points for the drilling equipment, leading to less disruption to vegetation and
soils as compared to open trench cutting along the entire length of the main.
As directional drilling minimizes surface disturbance, there is a lower risk of
contaminating soil and groundwater
with pollutants from construction
materials such as fuel needed for equipment in the installation process, and
the impact on land will be minimal and low risk in nature.
The proposed action may involve construction on land on slopes of 15% or
greater, however, only a small portion of the site, approximately 20%,
contains slopes. The site of the proposed booster pump station is relatively
flat and the project will be completed without creating slopes greater than
15%. Moreover, the site of the proposed booster pump station is extremely
wooded and remote, and development will not adversely impact visibility for
nearby residences, businesses, or other facilities. The natural features of the
site will be preserved, and proper erosion and sedimentation control measures
such as rip rap or vegetative buffers will be implemented to prevent soil
erosion and water and protect the surrounding land from sedimentation and
runoff.
Bedrock at the booster pump station site is generally within five (5) feet of
the existing ground surface according to the New York State Geological Survey
Surficial Geology of Dutchess County, NY Map. The depth to bedrock along the
proposed water main route varies but is also within five (5) for a significant
portion of the proposed water main route, particularly along Fall Kill Road and
Mill Road. The depth to bedrock along Route 9G is generally expected to be
deeper according to the NRCS Soil Maps (> 5 feet). The proposed water main
will be installed below frost depth at an estimated 4-5 feet below grade. Rock
removal will be required during construction of the water mains. Disturbed
areas within the project limits will be restored to their original condition.
The proposed action will create approximately 390 square feet of impervious
surface within the greater 3.7-acre existing North Tank Site parcel. The new
booster pump station will be installed at the North Tank site, with the rest of
the interconnection pipe installed below existing roadways, with no new
impervious surface created. Stormwater runoff generated as a result of the
booster pump station will be directed to the ground surface, and proper
erosion and sedimentation controls will be implemented during pre- and post-
construction periods. The project will implement stormwater and erosion
control measures during construction such as retaining walls, riprap, or
vegetative buffers to prevent further degradation of the project limits and
protect surrounding areas from sedimentation and runoff. Additionally, any
impacted vegetation will be restored to its original condition to allow the land
to meet its natural landscape and ecosystem functions; replanting of native
vegetation will occur as necessary to restore the project site.
The proposed project as described is not expected to have a significant
adverse impact on land. The project has been carefully sited to avoid sensitive
land areas such as wetlands, floodplains, wildlife habitats, and steep slopes,
and the project will be designed to limit land disturbance to the greatest
extend possible by methods including directional drilling and site specific
stormwater and erosion controls. The project will comply with all relevant
environmental regulations and permitting requirements to ensure all land
impacts are kept to a minimum. As such, the project is not expected to have
a significant impact on land.
Impact on Surface Water
The site of the proposed action contains surface waters including streams and
wetlands. Mapped NYSDEC streams present on or passing through the project
site include NYSDEC stream ID #862-412, 862-411, 862-415, 862-415.1,
862-393, 862-398, and 862-398.1, while mapped Federal Waters and NYS
wetlands include Wetland No. HP-12, HP-40, HP-15, and SP-19. Of the above
water bodies listed, the Fall Kill River and its tributaries are documented NYS
water quality-impaired water bodies due to pollutants and nutrients.
The proposed action will disturb more than one acre of land and create
stormwater runoff as a result of the construction of the new booster pump
station at the North Tank site. The stormwater runoff generated as a result of
the new booster pump station will be directed to the ground surface,
groundwater, and potentially adjacent properties. The parcel adjacent to the
proposed booster pump station, Tax ID: 133200-6165-01-100700-0000,
totals approximately 154 acres and is vacant and undeveloped. This adjacent
parcel is comprised of dense forest and vegetation.
The remaining portion of the interconnection pipe will be installed below
existing roadways, with no new impervious surface created. Further, the
proposed action does not involve any dredging, outfall construction, or
application of herbicides or pesticide. Based on this analysis and the planned
localized stormwater management controls, the project is not anticipated to
have any substantial impacts to surface waters.
Impact on Flooding
The site of the proposed action is in a designated floodway, 100-year
floodplain, and 500-year floodplain. The project site is also located in close
proximity to a principal aquifer. The installation of a new 8-inch water main to
connect the Quaker Hill Water System to the Hyde Park Regional Water
System will be installed within the existing right-of-way of public roads and
will result in a net zero flood risk change, as the public road right-of-way will
be restored to its original condition. The proposed construction of a new
booster pump station will, however, result in the creation of approximately
390 square feet of new
impervious surface, and as a result, create new
stormwater runoff at the site. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)
will be used to reduce stormwater flows and potential flood risks to the local
flood hazard areas, floodplain, and principal aquifer.
The project is not expected to cause a significant alteration to the
environmental characteristics of the site, such as the volume or velocity of
water that may cause flooding. The Project has been designed to minimize,
using best available measures, adverse effects on adjacent or nearby flood
hazard areas, and is designed to extend the life and use of the Quaker Hill
Water System to the Hyde Park Regional Water System. The project is not
expected to have any substantial impacts to flooding.
Impact on Plants and Animals
The proposed project may contain species of plants or animals that are listed
by the federal government or NYS as endangered or threatened. Based on the
EAF Mapper Report, the Blanding's Turtle (state-threatened) and Indiana Bat
(state and federally endangered) may be present within the proposed project
action area. Other common wildlife species that may pass through the project
area include frogs, turtles, deer, squirrels, birds, or chipmunks. These species
are common and typically seen in quiet, residential or urban neighborhoods.
Additionally, the proposed project contains a designated significant natural
community for the Red Maple-Hardwood Swamp (+/-100 acres) and Hemlock-
Northern Hardwood Forest (+/-750 acres).
Although species may be present within the project area, suitable habitat is
not present in the action area and the project does not otherwise present a
risk to the species. The Town of Hyde Park rights-of-way where portions of
water main installation will occur are asphalt paved, and therefore, do not
present suitable habitat for plant or animal species. Further, the North Tank
parcel is developed with a water tower, grassy landscaped areas, and fencing;
although common species like squirrels or birds may pass through, all areas
are previously disturbed, traversed areas by trucks and service workers for
maintenance that have been verified free of suitable habitat. Additionally, no
significant tree removal is anticipated as a part of this project, and as a result,
no impact to the Red
Maple-Hardwood Swamp or Hemlock-Northern
Hardwood Forest, or removal of known bat hibernaculum is anticipated as part
of this project.
Impact on Agricultural Resources
The proposed project is located within a New York State Agricultural District
("DUTC020"). However, based on a review of USDA Web Soil Survey data,
highly productive soils are not present on site. The proposed action is located
within previously disturbed areas including Hyde Park rights-of-way and a
DCWWA water tower site. The project limits are not available for agricultural
resources or farming uses. As such, no impact on agricultural resources is
anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Impact on Historic and Archaeological Resources
The proposed project is located adjacent to a building that is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places. The project site is located in the vicinity
of a Historic Building known as Quaker Lane Farms. Quaker Lane Farm, located
at 11 Ruskey Lane, is a historic farm/agricultural property dating back to the
late 19th century. The proposed project was submitted to SHPO for review on
April 17, 2024. A response was received from SHPO on May 7, 2024, noting
that the project is in an archaeologically and environmentally sensitive
location for historical sites and SHPO/OPRHP recommends a Phase IA/IB
Archaeology survey, unless prior substantial ground disturbance can be
documented. Tighe & Bond submitted additional information to SHPO in the
form of a supplementary memorandum on May 20, 2024, noting the presence
and locations of prior, significant ground disturbance, as well as details
pertaining to bedrock depths where the likelihood of historical and
archaeological resources within hard rock is extremely unlikely. No response
has been received as of the date of this SEQRA FEAF Part 1, 2, and 3
submission. Additional information can be made available upon request. An
archaeological survey will be completed if required by SHPO.
The exact interconnection water main path has not yet been through a detailed
design process. As such, a Negative Declaration conditioned to require
archeological survey of the project area following detailed design and prior to
site work is planned.
Impact on Critical Environmental Area
The project site is located within a state listed Critical Environmental Area
(CEA). The CEA is known as Hogback Hill, with the basis for designation as
sensitivity to change and habitat and species protection. The Town of Hyde
Park is the designation agency, and the CEA was established on June 7, 2009.
Since the entirety of the project site contains previously disturbed, man-
altered areas including asphalt paved rights-of-way and a parcel developed
with a water tower and associated protection infrastructure (fencing, etc.) no
impact to CEA is anticipated as a result of this project. As previously
mentioned in the sections above, the project has been carefully sited to avoid
sensitive land areas such as wetlands, floodplains, and sensitive areas, and
the project will be designed to limit land disturbance to the greatest extend
possible by methods including directional drilling and site specific stormwater
and erosion controls. As such, no significant adverse impacts to the CEA are
anticipated.
Impact on Energy
The proposed action may generate new or additional demand for energy. The
proposed booster pump station will require an estimated annual electricity
demand of 124,000kWh, which will be supplied by the grid/local utility
provider. Approximately 390 square feet of the booster station will require
energy to be heated/cooled. However, the action will not require a new or
upgrade to an existing substation, and the required energy needed to sustain
the booster pump station is minor in nature. The new facility will not be open
to the public and is not designed for long-term human occupancy. As such, no
significant impact to energy is anticipated.
Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light
The proposed action may result in an increase in noise during construction
activities only. The noise generated will be typical construction noise and
operational noise for a residential development. Hours of right-of-way
construction are anticipated to occur between 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday
through Friday. No construction activity will occur on weekends or holidays.
Additionally, the proposed project will include a generator which will be located
in a sound attenuating enclosure. The proposed noise is not expected to be
significant in nature and will not have a significant adverse impact on the
surrounding neighborhood.
In addition, wall mounted light fixtures are proposed by the entrance of the
new booster pump station. However, lighting will be dark sky compliant, and
will not have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood.
Impact on Human Health
The proposed action is located within 1,500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed
day care center, group home, nursing home, or retirement community. The
Franklin D. Roosevelt High School, North Park Elementary School, and
Creative Gardens Day Care facilities are located within 1,500 feet of the
project site. However, the proposed action does not involve the use of any
contaminants and does not involve the handling of hazardous waste or other
dangerous chemicals. Additionally, the project will not use, create, dispose of,
or store any hazardous substances as part of its construction or operation.
Proposed project work impacts are limited to the Hyde Park rights-of-way and
North Tank parcel, and pre- and post-construction activities are not
anticipated to have a significant impact on human health.
100
YEARS
KATHY HOCHUL
Governor
New York State
Parks, Recreation and
Historic Preservation
RANDY SIMONS
Commissioner Pro Tempore
ARCHAEOLOGY COMMENTS
Phase IA/IB Archaeological Survey Recommendation
Project: Hyde Park Regional Water System Interconnection & New Booster Pump Station Project
PR#. 24PR03417
Date: May 7, 2024
The project is in an archaeologically and environmentally sensitive location for archaeological sites. Therefore,
the State Historic Preservation Office/Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (SHPO/OPRHP)
recommends a Phase IA/IB archaeological survey for components of the project that will involve ground
disturbance, unless substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. A Phase IA/IB survey is
designed to determine the presence or absence of archaeological sites or other cultural resources in the
project's Area of Potential Effects (APE).
If you consider the entire project area to be disturbed, documentation of the disturbance will need to be
reviewed by SHPO/OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple episodes of
building construction and demolition. Documentation of ground disturbance typically consists of soil bore logs,
photos, or previous project plans. Agricultural activity is not considered to be substantial ground disturbance.
Please note that in areas with alluvial soils or fill archaeological deposits may exist below the depth of
superficial disturbances such as pavement or even deeper disturbances, depending on the thickness of the
alluvium or fill. Evaluation of the possible impact of prior disturbance on archaeological sites must consider the
depth of potentially culture-bearing deposits and the depth of planned disturbance by the proposed project.
Our office does not conduct archaeological surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archaeologist should be retained to
conduct the Phase IA/IB survey.
If you have any questions concerning archaeology, please contact Dr. Josalyn Ferguson at
[email protected].
Division for Historic Preservation
P.O. Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 • (518) 237-8643 • parks.ny.gov
518-237-8643 @ https://parks.ny.gov/shpo•
NYS PARKS CRIS APPLICATION
Tighe&Bond
Supplementary Information SHPO/OPRHP #24PR03417
Hyde Park Regional Water System Interconnection & New
Booster Pump Station Project
To:
FROM:
CoPY:
DATE:
Dr. Josalyn Ferguson, NYS SHPO/OPRHP
Dan Valentine, PE, Senior Project Manager
Allison Koch, Planner II
May 20, 2024
This memorandum provides additional information regarding the Hyde Park Regional Water
System Interconnection and New Booster Pump Station Project that was submitted to SHPO
on April 17th:
Consolidated Response Link: https://cris.parks.ny.gov/?type=CR&id=S6DJ1GX8S1DK
Project Number: 24PR03417
Project Type: Consultation
Project Name: Hyde Park Regional Water System Interconnection & New Booster Pump
Station Project
Consolidated Response Token: S6DJ1GX8S1DK
Submission Number: 24PR03417.001
Submission Description: Initial Consultation Submission
Based on our review of the Phase IA/IB Archaeological Survey Recommendation Memo, it is
the opinion of the consultant that the proposed project area or area of potential effects (APE)
includes ".. substantial prior ground disturbance, " as phrased by the NYSPRHP response letter
dated May 7, 2024. Details pertaining to this assessment are included in Section 1.1 and 1.2,
Additionally, we would like to provide clarity regarding the overall project scope and SEQRA
steps currently under consideration. The Duchess County Water and Wastewater Authority
(DCWWA) is currently in the process of considering an alternative treatment design location,
and it is possible that the Hyde Park Regional Water System interconnection and new booster
pump station project may not ultimately be the final, selected DCWWA alternative. The
DCWWA aspires to refine and select the most effective alternative that would provide the
greatest overall environmental and community benefit.
We have included the following information for further consideration and hope to coordinate
with Dr. Ferguson and the SHPO/OPRHP office prior to the determination of a need for a full
Phase IA/IB archaeological assessment based on the aforementioned information. We hope
that the following information may reduce your understanding of the APE for the project. We
would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this topic further.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Tighe&Bond
1.1 Prior Ground Disturbance
The area of potential effects (APE) of the proposed interconnection route and new booster
pump station are occurring entirely within previously disturbed areas in Hyde Park. The
proposed installation of a new water main would occur within existing Hyde Park road rights-
of-way, which are asphalt paved and maintained on a regular basis, and the proposed booster
pump station would be constructed on a parcel of land that is developed with an existing
water tower and protective fencing, and grassy, landscaped areas.
Within the APE, the stretch of road right-of-way between Hudson Drive and Route 9G includes
preexisting watermain below grade; although the new proposed water main would be installed
on the opposite side of the roadway where no mains are present, the general character of
roadway and its surrounding area is a heavily developed, urbanized neighborhood landscape.
Additionally, the several portions of the proposed water main corridor, approximately 21,000
linear feet, contains shallow bedrock (shown in red in Figure 1), which makes the likelihood
of historic or archaeological resources extremely improbable.
Psg = Stratified Sand and
Gravels
Br = Bedrock, generally 3 feet
or less below surface
Approximate Water Main Route
PiCs
FIGURE 1
Surficial Geology of Dutchess County, New York
Source: NYSGS
1.2 Site Soils + Hard Rock
Out of the Project's total +/-35,000 linear feet, approximately 21,000 linear feet is categorized
as hard rock, approximately 12,000 linear feet is categorized as loamy soil, and approximately
2,000 linear feet is categorized as soft rock, as detailed in the table below. Based on this
assessment, it is our opinion that the likelihood of historical and archaeological resources to
be present within this hard rock portion of the project site is extremely unlikely. A breakdown
of site soil types and estimated area is included in the table below, and a copy of the USDA
Web Soil Survey is attached.
-2-
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
FIGURE 2
NRCS Web Soil Survey Map
Source: USDA
TABLE 1
Water Main Route Soils Summary
Soil Symboi Category
HsB
Loam
HsB
Loam
DwB
Soft Rock
DWC
Soft Rock
NwB
Hard Rock
NyA
NwB
Loam
Hard Rock
NWD
Hard Rock
NwB
Hard Rock
NWD
Hard Rock
NwB
Hard Rock
NwB
Hard Rock
HSA
Wy
Loam
Loam
HSA
Wy
Loam
HsA
Loam
Loam
Surface Type
Cross Country
Local Road
Local Road
Local Road
Local Road
Local Road
Local Road
Local Road
-3-
Tighe&Bond
Length
(ft)
450
1,810
1,720
810
840
150
3,300
390
470
1,300
450
320
1,600
350
450
390
990
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Loam
Loam
Hard Rock
Loam
Hard Rock
Loam
Loam
Hard Rock
Hard Rock
Hard Rock
Tighe&Bond
State Road
State Road
State Road
State Road
State Road
State Road
State Road
State Road
Local Road
Cross Country
210
2,400
570
1,600
530
1,650
310
3,250
8,700
850
35,860
We look forward to discussing this project more. Thank you in advance.
-4-
Soil Map-Dutchess County, New York
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canais
Transportation
-
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
12 oil uveys hat comprise your Al were mapped at
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
progerion, which preserves rection and done bid merator
Thie versions gene aise from the USDA-NIRCS certied data as
15.0 or as are able as space lows) for map scales
27. 203) aerial images were photographed: 0c1 21.2022-001
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Sting dina end on unares ma be result. some minor
USDA
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Coo
ve Soil Survey
5/9/2024
Page 2
Soil Map-Dutchess County, New York
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
BeB
BeC
BeD
Ca
DuB
DwB
DwC
DwD
DxC
Ff
Fr
Ha
HsA
HsB
HuA
HvB
Ln
LV
MnA
MnB
NwB
NwC
Map Unit Name
Bernardston silt loam, 3 to 8
percent slopes
Bernardston silt loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
Bernardston silt loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
Canada i bam, neutral
Caton muck, 0 to 2 percent
Dutchess silt loam, 3 to 8
percent slopes
utchess-Cardigan comple
ndulating, rock
Dutchess-Cardigan complex,
rolling, rocky
Dutchess-Cardigan complex,
hilly, rocky
Dutchess-Cardigan-Urban land
complex, rolling, rocky
Fluvaquents-Udifluvents
complex, frequently flooded
Fredon silt loam
Halsey mucky silt loam
Hoosic gravelly loam, nearly
level
Hoosic gravelly loam,
undulating
Hoosic-Urban land complex.
nearly level
idson and Vergennes soils,
8 percent slop
Linlithgo silt loam
Livingston silt clay loam
Massena silt loam, O to :
percent slopes
Massena silt loam, 3 to 8
percent slopes
Nassau-Cardigan complex
undulating, very rocky
Nassau-Cardigan complex,
rolling, very rocky
Acres in AOl
12.0
0.2
51.0
239.2
47.8
86.8
261.8
479.4
96.4
51.6
61.3
39.4
18.7
443.3
203.3
128.2
11.8
2.6
45.8
11.2
18.8
491.2
1,423.3
USDA
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
Percent of AOl
0.1%
0.0%
0.6%
2.9%
0.6%
1.0%
3.1%
5.7%
1.2%
0.6%
0.7%
0.5%
0.2%
5.3%
2.4%
1.5%
0.1%
0.0%
0.5%
0.1%
0.2%
5.9%
17.1%
5/9/2024
Page 3 of 4
Soil Map-Dutchess County, New York
Map Unit Symbol
NwD
NxE
NxF
NyA
Ps
PZA
Su
Ud
Map Unit Name
Nassau-Cardigan complex,
hilly, very rocky
Acres in AOl
Percent of AOl
Ur
W
Wy
Totals for Area of Interest
Natchaug muck, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
Pits, gravel
Punsit silt loam, O to 3 percent
slopes
Sun silt loam
Udorthents, smoothed
Udorthents, wet substratum
Urban land
Water
Wayland silt loam
3,241.2
132.8
8.6
128.0
9.6
6.1
313.2
55.8
6.2
29.9
42.7
143.0
8,343.0
38.8%
1.6%
0.1%
1.5%
0.1%
0.1%
0.1%
0.4%
100.0%
USDA
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/9/2024
Page 4 of 4
STATE OF NEW YORK)
)SS.:
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS
1, the undersigned Deputy Director of the Dutchess County Water and Wastewater
Authority, DO HEREBY CERTIFY:
That I have compared the annexed extract of the minutes of the meeting of the Dutchess
County Water and Wastewater Authority, including the resolution contained therein, held on
June 5, 2024 with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a true and correct
transcript therefrom and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject
matters therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that all members of said Authority had due notice of said meeting.
| FURTHER CERTIFY that, pursuant to Section 103 of the Public Officers Law (Open
Meetings Law), said meeting was open to the general public.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, PRIOR to the time of said meeting, I duly caused a public notice
of the time and place of said meeting to be given to the following newspapers and/or other news
media as follows:
Newspaper and/or other news media
Poughkeepsie Journal
Date given
June 1, 2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand on the 11th day of June 2024.
APPROVED
churins: 01112024 347/10 PM
Jonathan Churins
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part I - Project and Setting
Instructions for Completing Part 1
Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,
are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to
any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist,
or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to
update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that
must be answered either "Yes" or "No". If the answer to the initial question is "Yes", complete the sub-questions that follow. If the
answer to the initial question is "No", proceed to the next question. Section Fallows the project sponsor to identity and attach any
additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information
contained in Part lis accurate and complete.
A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information.
Name of Action or Project:
Hyde Park Regional (HPR) Interconnection with Quaker Hill Water (QHW), Acquisition of Dutchess Estates Water, South Cross Water and ZOA creation
Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map):
Continuous Right-of-Ways along, State Route 9G, South Cross Road, Falkill Road, Forest Drive, and North Quaker Lane, and possible private easements
Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need):
The proposed action involves the installation of new 8-inch water main (approximately 36,000 linear feet) to connect the Quaker Hill Water System to the
quisition, Zone of Assessment (ZOA) creation and interconnection of the South Cross Road Water System at its closest viable point of connection, t
quisition, ZOA creation and interconnection of the Dutchess Estates Water System, and the ZOA creation of viable parcels along the final water m
trajectory to receive water services.
Name of Applicant/Sponsor:
Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority (DWWA)
Address: 1 LaGrange Avenue
City/PO: Poughkeepsie
Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role):
Jason Teed, Project Manager
Address:
1 LaGrange Avenue
City/PO:
Poughkeepsie
Property Owner (if not same as sponsor):
N/A - Public Right-of-Way
Address:
City/PO:
Telephone: (845) 486-3601
E-Mail: [email protected]
State: NY
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Zip Code: 12603
State:
NY
Telephone:
E-Mail:
Zip Code:
12603
State:
Zip Code:
Page 1 of 13
B. Government Approvals
B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. ("Funding" includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial
assistance.)
Government Entity
If Yes: Identify Agency and Approvals)
Required
Application Date
(Actual or projected)
a. City Counsel, Town Board,
or Village Board of Trustees
b. City, Town or Village
Planning Board or Commission
c. City, Town or
Village Zoning Board of Appeals
d. Other local agencies
ZIYesNo
Hyde Park Planning Board: Special Permit
May-June 2026 (projected)
Hyde Park Highway, Street Opening Permit, Bidg
May-June 2026 (projected)
Dept, Bidg Permit
c. County agencies
MYes•No
May-June 2026 (zi Ce for whole project),
f. Regional agencies
g. State agencies
KIYes•No
NYSDOT (highway), SHPO, NYSDOH, NYSEC, May-June 2026 (projected)
NYSEFC
h. Federal agencies
i. Coastal Resources.
i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway?
il. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program?
iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area?
C. Planning and Zoning
C.1. Planning and zoning actions.
Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the LYesINo
only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?
If Yes, complete sections C, F and G.
If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part I
C.2. Adopted land use plans.
a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land usc plan(s) include the site
where the proposed action would be located?
If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action
•Yes•No
would be located?
b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway;
•YesE No
Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan;
or other?)
If Yes, identify the plans):
c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan,
or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?
If Yes, identify the plan(s):
Page 2 of 13
C.3. Zoning
a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance.
DYesDNo
If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district?
The proposed project passes through four zoning districts: Neighborhood (N), Greenbelt (GB), Neighborhood Business (NBD), Neighborhood Core (NC)
b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit?
c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action?
If Yes,
i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site?
C.4. Existing community services.
a. In what school district is the project site located? Hyde Park CSD
b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site?
Hyde Park Police Department, Dutchess County Sheriff, and NYS Troopers
c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?
Roosevelt Fire District and West Clinton Fire District
d. What parks serve the project site?
Hyde Park Recreation and Parks
•Yes/No
D. Project Details
D.1. Proposed and Potential Development
a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all
components)? N/A - Utility Work
b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed?
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?
5 acres Note: 36,000 LF of water main will be
+/- 9.0 acres installed within existing ROW/Easements.
The proposed PS, if located outside ROW
will be at the North Storage Tank (3.7 acres)
5 acres Elevated Storage Tanks will be minimal
isturbance for access road and tooting
c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use?
i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units,
square feet)?
%
Units:
d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision?
•YesZNo
If Yes.
i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (c.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types)
ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed?
•Yes•No
iii. Number of lots proposed?
iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum
Maximum
e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases?
i. If No, anticipated period of construction:
24 months
ii. IfYes:
• Total number of phases anticipated
• Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition)
month
_ year
• Anticipated completion date of final phase
• Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may
determine timing or duration of future phases:
Page 3 of 13
f. Does the project include new residential uses?
If Yes, show numbers of units proposed
One Family
Two Family
Three Family
Multiple Family (four or more)
Initial Phase
At completion
of all phases
It Joes the proposed action include new non-residential construction (inclucing expansions)?
i. Total number of structures
ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure:
12 height;
16 width; and
24 length
ili. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled:
390 square feet
h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any
•YesONo
liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage?
If Yes,
i. Purpose of the impoundment:
ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water:
• Ground water • Surface water streams other specify:
iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source.
iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment.
Volume:
_ million gallons; surface area:
v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure:
height;
_length
vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (c.g., earth fill, rock, wood, conerete):
acres
D.2. Project Operations
a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both?
DYesNo
(Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated
materials will remain onsite)
If Yes:
i. What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging?
ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site?
• Volume (specify tons or cubic yards):
• Over what duration of time?
ili. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them.
iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials?
If yes, describe.
r: What is the total area to be dredged or excavated?
vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time?
vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging?
vii. Will the excavation require blasting?
ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan:
acres
_acres
feet
b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment
into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent arca?
i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic
description):
Page 4 of 13
il. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, c.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or
alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres:
iti. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments?
If Yes, describe:
iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation?
• acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed:
• expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:
• purpose of proposed removal (eg. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access):
• proposed method of plant removal:
• if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify products):
v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance:
c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water?
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day:
ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply?
gallons/day
Name of district or service area:
• Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal?
• Is the project site in the existing district?
• Is expansion of the district needed?
• Do existing lines serve the project site?
iti. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project?
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
• Source(s) of supply for the district:
iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site?
If, Yes:
• Applicant/sponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
• Proposed source(s) of supply for new district:
v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project:
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
•Yes No
•Yes• No
•Yes• No
•Yes•No
• Yes•No
vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity:
gallons/minute.
d. Will the proposed action gencrate liquid wastes?
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day:
gallons/day
ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (c.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and
approximate volumes or proportions of each):
ili. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities?
If Yes:
Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used:_
Name of district:
Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project?
Is the project site in the existing district?
Is expansion of the district needed?
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
•YesONo
Page 5 of 13
•
Do existing sewer lines serve the project site?
•
Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project?
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
•Yes•No
•YesNo
iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site?
•Yes•No
If Yes:
Applicant/sponsor for new district:
Date application submitted or anticipated:
What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge?
: If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specitying propose
eceiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans)
vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste:
c. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create storinwater runoff, either from new point
sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point
source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction?
MYes•No
• How much imperious surface will the project create in relation too sat includeprome pation and Footings for Storage Tan
1000 Square feet or
cres impervious surtace)
Square feet or
acres (parcel size)
ii. Describe lypes of new point sources Purvays ion Noth Sprage ask orce alevato Stage Ta, Poil be installed below existing.
ili. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.c. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties,
groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
To the ground surface
If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands:
Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties?
iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater?
f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel
combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations?
If Yes, identify:
i. Mobile sources during project operations (c.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles)
ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers)
ili. Stationary sources during operations (c.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation)
g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit,
or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?
i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet
ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year
ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate:
Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (NO)
Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)
Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF.)
Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs)
Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)
2Yes• No
•YesNo
Page 6 of 13
h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants,
landfills, composting facilities)?
•YesMNo
i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric):
ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (c.g., combustion to generate heat or
electricity, flaring):
i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as
quarry or landfill operations?
If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (c.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust):
•YesyNo
j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial
new demand for transportation facilities or services?
i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply):
• Randomly between hours of
ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks):
iii. Parking spaces:
Existing
Proposed
Net increase/decrease
iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking?
DYesONO
v: If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe:
i. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site
i Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electri
or other alternative fueled vehicles?
vili. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing
pedestrian or bicycle routes?
•Yes•No
•Yes•No
k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand
i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action:
it. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or
other):
ili. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation?
•YesaNo
I. Hours of opcration. Answer all items which apply.
i. During Construction:
Monday - Friday:
• Saturday:
Sunday:
• Holidays:
7:00am - 5:00pm
None
None
None
ii. During Operations:
•
Monday - Friday:
• Saturday:
•
Sunday:
Holidays:
24/7
24/7
24/7
24/7
Page 7 of 13
m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction,
operation, or both?
If yes:
i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration:
Construction will occur Monday-Friday, 7:00am - 5:00pm, excluding holidays.
ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen?
Describe:
•YesZNo
n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting?
If yes:
i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures:
Wall mounted light fixtures are proposed approximately 8'-10' above ground level, above the new main entrance of the proposed booster pump station.
Proposed lighting will be dark sky compliant.
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen?
•YesØNo
Describe:
o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day?
If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest
occupied structures:
p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons)
or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage?
(e.g., month, year)
ili. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities:
q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recrcational projects only) usc pesticides (i.e., herbicides,
insecticides) during construction or operation?
If Yes:
i. Describe proposed treatments):
• Yes ENo
ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices?
r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal
of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)?
i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility:
• Construction:
_ (unit of time)
• Operation :
tons per
_(unit of time)
ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste:
• Construction:
• Operation:
iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:
• Construction:
• Operation:
• Yes •No
• Yes No
Page 8 of 13
s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility?
• Yes 2 No
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (c.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or
other disposal activitics):
ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or
Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment
ill. If landfill, anticipated site life:
years
t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous •YesZNo
waste?
If Yes:
i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be gencrated, handled or managed at facility:
ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents:
ili. Specify amount to be handled or gencrated
tons/month
iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents:
v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility?
If Yes: provide name and location of facility:
If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:
•Yes•No
E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action
E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site
a. Existing land uses.
i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site.
• Urban
Z Industrial
• Commercial
D Residential (suburban)
• Rural (non-farm)
• Agriculture O Aquatic
D Other (specify): Right-of-way
ii. If mix of uses, generally describe:
b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or
Covertype
Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious
surfaces
Forested
•
Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non-
agricultural, including abandoned agricultural)
•
Agricultural
(includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.)
•
Surface water features
(lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.)
•
Wetlands (freshwater or tidal)
•
Non-vegetated (bare rock, carth or fill)
•
Other
Describe:
Current
Acreage
24
3
Acreage After
Project Completion
24.01
3
Change
(Acres +/-)
+0.01
0.8
0.81
+0.01
Page 9 of 13
c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation?
i. If Yes: explain:
d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed
day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site?
i. Identify Facilities:
Franklin D. Roosevelt High School, North Park Elementary School, Creative Gardens Day Care
e. Does the project site contain an existing dam?
If Yes:
i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:
•
Dam height:
Dam length:
•
Surface area:
•
Volume impounded:
ii. Dam's existing hazard classification:
ill. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
feet
feet
acres
_ gallons OR acre-feet
•Yes No
f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility,
•Yes&No
or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility?
If Yes:
i. Has the facility been formally closed?
•Yes No
• If yes, cite sources/documentation:
ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundarics of the solid waste management facility:
ill. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities:
Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjo
roperty which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste
If Yes:
i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred:
h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any
remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?
i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site
Remediation database? Check all that apply:
• Yes - Spills Incidents database
• Yes - Environmental Site Remediation database
Provide DEC ID numbers):
Provide DECID numbers):
• Neither database
ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:
•Ycs•No
iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database?
If yes, provide DEC ID number(s):
iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s):
OYcs•No
Page 10 of 13
v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses?
•
If yes, DEC site ID number:
•
Describe the type of institutional control (c.g., deed restriction or casement):
•
Describe any use limitations:
•
Describe any engineering controls:
Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place?
•
Explain:
•YesONo
•YesNo
E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site
a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site?
b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site?
If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings?
c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site:
Nassau-Cardigan Complex
Hoosic Gravelly Loam
Nassau-Rock
d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average:
c. Drainage status of project site soils: 2 Well Drained:
Moderately Well Drained:
• Poorly Drained
f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes:
0-10%:
10-15%:
/ 15% or greater:
2-4 feet
15%
VYes•No
50% PS, Pipe
45 % Pipe
5% > Storage Tank
feet
_ of site Relative to pump station and storage tank
% of site locations
_% of site
50% of site Relative to water main, and all
30% of site pumpstation and storage
20% of site
g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site?
If Yes, describe:
h. Surface water features.
i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers,
ponds or lakes)?
ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site?
MYes•No
If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i.
ill. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal,
state or local agency?
iv. For cach identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information:
•
Name 862-412, 862-413, 862-415, 862-415.1, 862-393, ...
•
Classification AT), C
Lakes or Ponds: Name
•
Classification
Wetlands:
Name Federal Waters, NYS Wetland, Federal Waters, Fe...
Approximate Size NYS Wetland (in a...
• Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) HP-40
v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired
MYes•No
waterbodies?
If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired:
Name - Pollutants - Uses:Fall Kill and tribs - Total Phosphorus
i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway?
DYes•No
j. Is the project site in the 100-ycar Floodplain?
k. Is the project site in the 500-ycar Floodplain?
I. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer?
If Yes:
i. Name of aquiter: Principal Aquifer
Page 11 of 13
m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site:
Frogs
Squirrels
Turtles
Various Bird Species
Chipmunks
n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community?
If Yes:
1. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation):
Red Maple-Hardwood Swamp, Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest
ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation:
iii. Extent of community/habitat:
•
Currently:
•
Following completion of project as proposed:
• Gain or loss (indicate + or -):
102.0, 749.66
acres
acres
acres
o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as
endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species?
If Yes:
i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened):
Blanding's Turtle, Indiana Bat
•Yes•No
p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of
special concern?
If Yes:
i. Species and listing:
•Yes No
q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing?
If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use:
•Yes/No
E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site
a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to
Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?
If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: DUTC020 (State Designation) County Agricultural District (21)
b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present?
i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site?
ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s):
c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National
Natural Landmark?
i. Nature of the natural landmark:
• Biological Community
• Geological Feature
ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent:
VYes•No
d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Arca?
ii. Basis for designation: Sensitivity to change & habitat and species protection
ili. Designating agency and date: Agency:Hyde Park, Town of, Date:6-7-2009
Page 12 of 13
e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archacological site, or district
Yes No
which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS
Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places?
i. Nature of historic/archacological resource: MArchacological Site
Historic Building or District
ii. Name: Stoutenburgh, William, House
iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based:
William: Historic Home 18th Century
f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for
archacological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory?
g. Have additional archacological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site?
If Yes:
i. Describe possible resource(s):
ii. Basis for identification:
h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local
scenic or aesthetic resource?
i. Identify resource: Black Creek Preserve, Riverfront Park, Hyde Park Rec, Pinewoods Park, Roosevelt Farm Lane, Staatsburg Park Playground
ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (c.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway,
etc.): local parks and scenic riverfront locations
iti. Distance between project and resource:
O and 5 miles.
i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers
Program 6 NYCRR 666?
If Yes:
i. Identify the name of the river and its designation:
ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666?
•Yes•No
F. Additional Information
Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any
measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification
I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Jonathan Churins
Signature_
father to
Date 2025-03-31
Title Executive Director
PRINT FORM
Page 13 of 13
EAF Mapper Summary Report
Monday, March 31, 2025 7:49 AM
8266-01-109721-0000
62 66-5
-125711-0000
6246-01/150701-00006256-01-201702-0000
6266-04-162953-0000
6266-01-183651-0000
6266-01-157655-0000
6266-01-257651-0000
6206-01-177 652-0000
6266-01-324672-0000
6266-01/22 4531-00006296-01-302709-0000
Hyde Park
Disclaimer:
The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are
answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF
question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks.
Although
the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order
to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a
substitute for agency determinations.
Sand
Barrie
Brichile
Kingstor
Montpel
Toronto
Honliton
on
Rochester
BuitNo
Nes Vort
52 66-01-0845 63-0000
62 66-01-2 955 86-0000
Albany
6260-01-156552-0900 6266-03-1067929A00
6266-01-165507-0000 6265-01-25 0549-00996266-01-307552-0000
Sourcer Err, HERE Garmin, USGS Irtermas INCREMERORY
Sources/Esri HERE, SET 21589 929-0000209:02:2171892099
VAcan Er Japan MET Es Chira Fong Korp, Es Korea, Es
6246-01252526-00 200205416403035.273
(Thailand, INGOC, Is OpenStreetMap cortmoutors and the GIS
B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area]
B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area]
C.2.b. [Special Planning District]
E. 1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -
Potential Contamination History]
E. 1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -
Listed]
E. 1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site -
Environmental Site Remediation Databasel
E. 1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation
Site]
E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features]
E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features]
E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features]
E. 2.h.iii [Surface Water Features]
No
No
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and
waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream
862-412, 862-413, 862-415, 862-415.1, 862-393, 862-398
Name]
E. 2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream
A(T), C
Classification]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Federal Waters, NYS Wetland
Name]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres): 18.2
Size]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - DEC
HP-40
Wetlands Number]
E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies]
Yes
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report
E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies - Name and
Name - Pollutants - Uses:Fall Kill and tribs - Total Phosphorus
Basis for Listing]
E.2.i. [Floodway]
E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain]
E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain]
E.2.l. [Aquifers]
E.2.I. [Aquifer Names]
E.2.n. [Natural Communities]
E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Name]
E.2.n.i [Natural Communities - Acres]
E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species]
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Principal Aquifer
Yes
Red Maple-Hardwood Swamp, Hemlock-Northern Hardwood Forest
102.0, 749.66
Yes
E. 2.0. [Endangered or Threatened Species - Blanding's Turtle, Indiana Bat
Name]
E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals]
E.3.a. [Agricultural District]
E.3.a. [Agricultural District]
E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark]
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area]
No
Yes
DUTC020
No
Yes
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area - Name]
E.3.d.ii [Critical Environmental Area -
Sensitivity to change & habitat and species protection
Reason]
E.3.d.iii [Critical Environmental Area - Date
Agency:Hyde Park, Town of, Date:6-7-2009
and Agency]
E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic
Yes - Digital mapping data for archaeological site boundaries are not
Places or State Eligible Sites]
available. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.3.e.ii [National or State Register of Historic Stoutenburgh, William, House
Places or State Eligible Sites - Name]
E.3.f. [Archeological Sites]
E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor]
Yes
No
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report
Environment Committee Roll Call
District
District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley
District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook
District 3 - LaGrange
District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon
District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie
District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie
District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie
District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie
District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie
District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger
District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill
District 24 - Dover and Pawling
12
Resolution:
Motion:
Present:
Absent:
Vacant:
Name
Truitt*
Houston*
Polasek*
Valdés Smith*
Atkins*
Gorman
Lawler
D'Aquanni (C)
Kaul
Paoloni (VC)
Page
House
Total:
Abstentions:
Yes
No
12
Yes
No
2025183 ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONE OF ASSESSMENT "031" IN THE DUTCHESS COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF HYDE PARK
NOVEMBER 6, 2025
Roll Call Sheets
District
Present:
Absent:
Vacant:
District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley
District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook
District 3 - LaGrange
District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon
District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie
District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie
District 2 - LaGrange, Pleasant Valley & Town of Poughkeepsie
District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie
District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie
District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie
District 8 - City and Town of Poughkeepsie
District 10 - City of Poughkeepsie
District 11 - Clinton, Pleasant Valley, and Rhinebeck
District 12 - East Fishkill
District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger
District 14 - Wappinger and Town of Poughkeepsie
District 15 - Wappinger
District 17 - Town and Village of Fishkill
District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill
District 19 - North East, Stanford, Pine Plains, Milan & Red Hook
District 20 - Red Hook, Tivoli, and Rhinebeck
District 21 - East Fishkill
District 22 - Beekman and Union Vale
District 23 - Pawling, Beekman and East Fishkill
24.
District 24 - Dover and Pawling
Motion:
Last Name
YES
Truitt
Houston
Polasek
Valdés Smith
Atkins
Gorman
Travelpiece
Lawler
D'Aquanni
Kaul
Brendli
Johnson
Kearney
Metzger
Paoloni
Versaci
Faust
McHoul
Page
Drago
Munn
Caswell
Garito
Rolison
House
Total:
Yes
Abstentions:
NO
Absent
No
2025183 ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONE OF ASSESSMENT "031" IN THE DUTCHESS COUNTY
WATER DISTRICT LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF HYDE PARK
NOVEMBER 10, 2025