countyDutchess County Legislature
2026130
ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH RFESPECT TO LANDOWNER REQUEST TO INCLUDE THEIR PROPERTY WITHIN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT 21
- Introduced
- August 9, 2026
- Latest action
- August 9, 2026
- Status
- ADOPTED
- District coverage
- scope: countywide
Document text
Extracted from the official document; OCR may contain errors.
ENVIRONMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 2026130
RE:
ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH RESPECT TO
LANDOWNER REQUESTS TO INCLUDE THEIR PROPERTY
WITHIN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT 21
Legislators VALDÉS SMITH, MUNN, ARNOFF, BRENDLI, GILES, HOUSE, KAUL,
KEARNEY, LAWLER, REDL, RHODES and WINSBY offer the following and move its
adoption:
WHEREAS, this Legislature is considering Landowner requests to include their property
within Dutchess County Agricultural District 21, in accordance with Agricultural and Markets
Law Section 303-b and the recommendations of the Dutchess County Agricultural and Farmland
and Protection Board (AFPB), and
WHEREAS, approval of modifications constitutes an action subject to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and
WHEREAS, the Dutchess County Legislature has attached a Short Environmental
Assessment Form, which concludes that the program constitutes: (1) an Unlisted Action pursuant
to Article VIII of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and part 617 of the
NYCRR (SEQRA); and (2) that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse
environmental impacts, and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Legislature in adopting this Resolution is to adopt and
confirm those findings, and
WHEREAS, a true copy of the Short Environmental Assessment Form and the Negative
Declaration reflecting the finding that the action will not result in any significant adverse
environmental impacts are attached hereto and made a part hereof, now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the Dutchess County Legislature hereby adopts the Short
Environmental Assessment Form and Negative Declaration regarding modification of
Agricultural District 21, as recommended by the AFPB, and confirms it will ARe hoveny
significant adverse environmental impacts.
Susan Jerino
SUSAN J. SERINO
STATE OF NEW YORK
ss:
COUNTY EXECUTIVE
COUNTY OF DUTCHESS
This is to certif that 1, the undersigned Clerk of the Legislature of the Count of Dutches, hare co Dale: AS all 202 girl
Resolution not on file in the office of said Clerk, and which tas adopted by said Legislature on the 10th dar of August 2026, ard the same a true and correct
transcript of said original Resolution and the whole thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set mr hand and seal of said Legislature this 11th day of
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
FOR AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS
UNLISTED ACTIONS ONLY
Please indicate lead agency status by checking the appropriate box below:
The proposed action is within the scope of a cooperative agreement between the undersigned
County Legislative Body (“CLB”) and the Department of Agriculture and Markets (“Department”), the only
other agency required to undertake an action in this case. Therefore, the undersigned CLB will serve as
lead agency for the proposed action to ensure compliance with the requirements of the State
Environmental Quality Review Act, and is undertaking a coordinated review of the proposed action with
the Department pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.6(b)(3).
The proposed action is not within the scope of a cooperative agreement between an applicable CLB
and the Department. The agency that will serve as Lead Agency is the undersigned CLB, and is
undertaking a coordinated review of the proposed action with the Department pursuant to 6 NYCRR
§617.6(b)(3).
Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information
Dutchess
1. The proposed action is located in the County of________________________________ and the Town(s) of
.
____________________________________________________________________________________
2. The agency responsible for preparing this Short Environmental Assessment Form and determining
Dutchess
environmental significance is the CLB of __________________________ County.
3. The name, address, and e-mail address for the Clerk of the above named CLB is:
Julie Shiroishi, Clerk Dutchess County Legislature
22 Market Street, 6th Floor Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
[email protected]
.
4. Does the proposed action only involve the modification, consolidation or termination of a county-adopted,
State-certified agricultural district by the CLB pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law (AML) §§303-a, 303-b
or 303-c? Yes No
If Yes, attach a narrative description (including a location map) of the intent of the proposed action and the
environmental resources that may be affected in the County. If No, this form should not be used to evaluate
the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action.
5. Is this an action proposed to modify an existing agricultural district? Yes No
195,426If Yes, total number of acres comprising the agricultural district as it exists prior to modification: _________ acres.
Short Environmental Assessment Form
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets
6. If this proposed action involves a modification, will such modification result in a change in the size of the
agricultural district? Yes No
216.2
• If yes, how many acres are involved in the change? ____________ acres
• Does this represent an increase or a decrease?
7. Check all present land uses that occur on, adjoining, and near the proposed action?
Residential Industrial Commercial Agriculture Park/Forest/Open Space Other
If Other, please describe:
8. Information on Coastal Resources. Is the action located within, or have a significant effect on:
• A Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? Yes No
• A Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Yes No
• A community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Yes No
If Yes, please identify the affected community or communities: ________________________________
9. Information on Local Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plans
• Is the action compatible with the County’s Agricultural & Farmland Protection Plan? Yes No
5/22/15
If Yes, date of Plan approval: ____________________
If Yes, please cite the applicable language:
Since the adoption of the Plan, we have offered several educational opportunities about the differences between the Agricultural Districts Program and Agricultural Value Assessment. In
addition, we have audited communities for their farm friendliness and offered improvements to zoning that could further the agricultural industry. Ensuring that our agriculturally viable land is included in these districts will ensure its future usage for agriculture.
10. Comments from Municipalities within the County
• Did the CLB receive any comments from municipalities about the addition or removal of land from the
agricultural district? Yes No
If Yes, please briefly summarize the comments:
The Town wrote in support of the Three Sprouts application.
11. Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify the proposed action.
I AFFIRM AND CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Name of Person
Eoin Wrafter 6/7/2026
Authorized to Sign: ______________________________________________
Date:
_______________
Signature: ______________________________________
Title:
Commissioner, Planning & Development
_____________________________
SEAF NYSDAM ver. 9/28/2020 Page 2 of 4
Short Environmental Assessment Form
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets
Part 2: Impact Assessment
Part 2 is to be completed by the County Legislative Body (“CLB”) as Lead Agency.
Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials
submitted to the CLB for the proposed modification, consolidation or termination of a county-adopted, State-
certified agricultural district or otherwise available to the reviewer.
In providing responses to each of the questions, the reviewer should keep in mind that the action proposed is the
modification, consolidation or termination of an agricultural district(s) The action is not the land use or activity
which will, or may, take place in the district(s). For example, it is not appropriate to consider the effects of
management actions that may be taken by individual operators in conducting farming. Agricultural farm
management practices, including construction, maintenance and repair of farm buildings, and land use changes
consistent with generally accepted principles of farming are listed as Type II actions in 6 NYCRR §617.5(c)(3),
and these actions have been determined not to have a significant impact on the environment.
None to
small impact
may occur
Moderate to
large impact
may occur
1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use
plan or zoning regulations?
2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of
land?
3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing
community?
4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental
characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental
Area (CEA)?
5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of
traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway?
6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and fail to
incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy
opportunities?
7. Will the proposed action impact existing:
a. public / private water supplies?
b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities?
8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important
historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources?
9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources
(e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)?
10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,
flooding or drainage problems?
11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or
human health?
SEAF NYSDAM ver. 9/28/2020 Page 3 of 4
Short Environmental Assessment Form
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets
Part 3: Determination of Significance
For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur," or if there is a need to
explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse
environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any
measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3
should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential
impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic
scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short term, long-term and cumulative impacts.
eck this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentatio
and a promena mad salmon is reure potentialy large or significant adverse impa.
that the propose au have not rest any in the informers and annenis love, and any supporting documentation,
County of Dutchess
6/7/2026
Name of Lead Agency
Yvette Valdés Smith
Chairmen, County Legislature
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Jest Kilde Santon,
Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer)
SEAF NYSDAM ver. 9/28/2020
Page 4 of 4
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT FORM FOR AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS
Question 4 Narrative:
The Dutchess County Legislature intends to modify Dutchess County Agricultural District 21 through the addition of 11 parcels or 216.2 acres, resulting in a new Agricultural District acreage of 196,161.
There are no significant adverse environmental impacts on environmental resources due to the proposed modifications to Agricultural District 21.
Environment Committee Roll Call
District Name Yes No
District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon Valdés Smith*
X
District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie Atkins*
X
District 20 - Red Hook, Tivoli, and Rhinebeck Munn*
X
District 3 - LaGrange Polasek*
X
District 12 - East Fishkill Metzger*
X
District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie Redl
X
District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie Shah
X
District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie Kaul (C)
X
District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger Giles
X
District 14 - Wappinger and Town of Poughkeepsie Winsby (VC)
ABSENT
District 21 - East Fishkill Caswell
X
District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook Alexander
X
11
Present: ____
1
Absent: ____
Vacant: ____
Resolution: ____
Motion: ____
11
Total : ______ ______
Yes No
Abstentions: ______
2026130 ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH RESPECT TO LANDOWNER
REQUESTS TO INCLUDE THEIR PROPERTY WITHIN AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT 21
Roll Call Sheets
District Last Name YES NO
District 16 - Fishkill and Beacon Valdés Smith
District 9 - City of Poughkeepsie Atkins
District 20 - Red Hook, Tivoli, and Rhinebeck Munn
District 3 - LaGrange Polasek
District 12 - East Fishkill Metzger
District 1 - Town of Poughkeepsie Redl
District 2 - LaGrange, Pleasant Valley & Town of Poughkeepsie Arnoff
District 4 - Hyde Park and Town of Poughkeepsie Lawler
District 5 - Town of Poughkeepsie Shah
District 6 - Town of Poughkeepsie Kaul
District 7 - Hyde Park and Pleasant Valley Darrow
District 8 - City and Town of Poughkeepsie Brendli
District 10 - City of Poughkeepsie Johnson
District 11 - Clinton, Pleasant Valley, and Rhinebeck Kearney
District 13 - East Fishkill and Wappinger Giles
District 14 - Wappinger and Town of Poughkeepsie Winsby
District 15 - Wappinger Faust
District 17 - Town and Village of Fishkill McHoul
District 18 - City of Beacon and Fishkill Rhodes
District 19 - North East, Stanford, Pine Plains, Milan & Red Hook Drago
District 21 - East Fishkill Caswell
District 22 - Beekman and Union Vale Tresca
District 23 - Pawling, Beekman and East Fishkill Rolison
District 24 - Dover and Pawling House
District 25 - Amenia, Washington, Pleasant Valley & Millbrook Alexander
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ABSENT
X
X
X
X
X
X
ABSENT
X
X
X
X
X
23
Present: ____
2
Absent: ____
Vacant: ____
Resolution: ____
Motion: ____
23 0
Total : ______ ______
Yes No
Abstentions: ____
CONSENT AGENDA: RESOLUTIONS 2026123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 133, 135, 137